Letter to the Editor
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Stem Cells. Nov 26, 2024; 16(11): 978-984
Published online Nov 26, 2024. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v16.i11.978
Table 2 Effects of mesenchymal stem cell source and processing protocols on extracellular vesicle composition and therapeutic efficacy
Variables
Description
Ref.
MSC sourceDifferent tissues (adipose, bone marrow, umbilical cord) produce EVs with different profiles. ADMSCs contain elevated levels of proregenerative factors, such as miRNAs that promote angiogenesis and modulate immune responsesLiu et al[2], 2024; Souza et al[6], 2024
Processing protocolsCulture conditions and EV isolation techniques influence EV content and function. Suspension cultures improve EV yield and functionality. Hypoxic preconditioning enhances EVs with tissue repair and immunomodulatory factorsJeyaraman et al[1], 2024; Suryawan et al[17], 2021
Therapeutic efficacyTherapeutic potential of MSC-derived EVs is associated with their specific compositional profiles. ADMSC-derived EVs are particularly effective in promoting wound healing and modulating immune responses because of their distinct miRNA and protein contentsSoltani et al[8], 2024; Symonds et al[18], 2023
Challenges and considerationsVariability in EV composition necessitates careful MSC source selection and standardized processing protocols to optimize therapeutic outcomes. Standardization is essential for producing EVs with consistent therapeutic propertiesLiu et al[2], 2024; Carr et al[3], 2024