Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Stem Cells. Mar 26, 2023; 15(3): 31-51
Published online Mar 26, 2023. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v15.i3.31
Table 2 Dental stem cell-based clinical trials from published articles
Ref.
Registration ID
Conditions/diseases
Study design
Cell source
Administration route
Interventions
Follow-up period
Outcomes
Test group
Control group
Xuan et al[28], 2018NCT01814436Pulp necrosisRCTAutologous deciduous pulpImplanted into injured teethSHED (n = 26)Traditional apexification treatment (n = 10)12 mo; 24 moDental pulp tissue regeneration; no adverse events observed; the length of the root (↑); the width of the apical foramen (↓)
Nakashima et al[35], 2022NoneIrreversible pulpitisCase seriesAutologous dental pulpTransplanted into the root canalDPSCs + Gelatin sponge + G-CSF (n = 5)None1, 2, 4, 12, 24, 28, 32 wkPulp sensibility (↑); MRI examination showed similar SI between test teeth and untreated controls
Nakashima et al[37], 2017NoneIrreversible pulpitisCase seriesAutologous dental pulpTransplanted into the root canalDPSCs + Gelatin sponge + G-CSF (n = 2)None1, 4, 12, 24, and 48 wkMRI examination showed similar SI between test teeth and untreated controls; mineralized tissue deposition (↑)
Meza et al[36], 2019NoneIrreversible pulpitisA case reportAutologous inflamed dental pulpTransplanted into the root canalDPSCs + L-PRF (n = 1)None6 mo; 3 yearDelayed response to the cold test; positive response to electric pulp testing; dentin bridge formation
Shiehzadeh et al[38], 2014NonePeriapical lesionsCase seriesCase 1 and case 3: Autologous apical papilla; case 2: Deciduous pulpCase 1 and Case 3: Injected from root apex to cavity; case 2: Injected into the defect via a surgical approachCase 1 and Case 3: SCAP + PEG-PLGA scaffold (n = 2); case 2: SHED + PEG-PLGA scaffold (n = 1)NoneCase 1: 30 d, 3 mo, 1 year; 2 year; case 2: 3, 6, 18 mo; case 3: 3, 6, 12, 24 moDeveloped mature apices; periapical tissue healing (↑)
Prasad et al[39], 2017NonePeriapical lesionsCase seriesAllogeneic deciduous pulpTransplanted into the root canalSHED + Bioglass (n = 2)None7, 30, 90, 180, 365 dClosure of open apex; periapical tissue healing; positive response to electric pulp testing and cold testing
Prasad et al[40], 2019NonePeriapical lesionsA case reportAllogeneic deciduous pulpTransplanted into the root canal and periapical areaSHED + Bioglass (n = 1)None2 wk; 4, 12, 24 moPeriapical tissue healing; positive response to electric pulp testing
Ferrarotti et al[41], 2018NCT03386877Periodontal intrabony defectsRCTAutologous dental pulpImplanted into bone defect sites consisted of MISTPulp micrografts + Collagen sponge (n = 15)Collagen sponge (n = 14)6 and 12 moPD (↓); CAL (↓); bone defect fill (↑); residual PD < 5 mm and CAL gain ≥ 4 mm (↑)
Sánchez et al[42], 2020ISRCTN13093912Periodontal intrabony defectsCCTAutologous periodontal ligamentImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachPDLSCs + β-TCP (n = 9)β-TCP (n = 10)1, 3, 6, 9, 12 moCAL (-); PPD (-)
Feng et al[43], 2010NonePeriodontal intrabony defectsCase seriesAutologous periodontal ligamentImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachPDLPs + HA/TCP (n = 3)None3, 6, 12, 32, 42, and 72 moCAL (↓); PD (↓); GR (↑)
Chen et al[29], 2016 NCT01357785Periodontal intrabony defectsRCTAutologous periodontal ligamentImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachPDLSCs sheets + DBBM (n = 20)DBBM (n = 21)2 wk; 3, 6, 12 moCAL (-); PD (-); GR (-)
Iwata et al[44], 2018UMIN000005027Periodontal intrabony defectsCase seriesAutologous periodontal ligamentImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachPDL-derived cell sheets + β-TCP (n = 10)None3, 6, 55 ± 19 moCAL (↓); PD (↓); bone height (↑)
Vandana et al[125], 2015NonePeriodontal intrabony defectsA case reportAutologous periodontal ligamentImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachPeriodontal ligament soft tissue + Gelatin sponge + Cementum scrapings (n = 1)None1 wk; 3, 6, 12 moCAL (↓); PD (↓); BMD (↑)
Aimetti et al[47], 2014NonePeriodontal intrabony defectsA case reportAutologous dental pulpImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachPulp micrografts + Collagen sponge (n = 1)None6 mo; 1 yearPPD (↓); bone fill (↑)
Aimetti et al[46], 2018NonePeriodontal intrabony defectsCase seriesAutologous dental pulpImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachPulp micrografts + Collagen sponge (n = 11)None1 yearCAL (↓); PD (↓); bone fill (↑)
Aimetti et al[49], 2015NonePeriodontal intrabony defectsCase seriesAutologous dental pulpImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachPulp micrografts + Collagen sponge (n = 4)None6, 12 moPD (↓); CAL (↓); bone fill (↑)
Hernández-Monjaraz et al[48], 2018ISRCTN12831118Periodontal intrabony defectsA case reportAllogeneic dental pulpImplanted into bone defect sites via surgical approachDPSCs + Lyophilized collagen-polyvinylpyrrolidone sponge scaffold (n = 1)None3, 6 moPD (↓); TM (↓); bone fill (↑)
Barbier et al[57], 2018EudraCT database 2014-001913-18Post-extraction socketsSplit-mouth RCTAutologous dental pulpImplanted into postextraction socketsPulp micrografts + collagen matrix (n = 30)Collagen matrix (n = 30)6 moBMD (-); interdental septum height (-)
Cubuk et al[62], 2023NCT04641533Post-extraction socketsSplit-mouth RCTAutologous dental pulpImplanted into postextraction socketsPulp micrografts + L-PRF (n = 13)L-PRF (n = 13)7 d; 6 moPPD (-); CAL (-); vertical bone loss (-); relative bone density (-)
d’Aquino et al[58], 2009NonePost-extraction socketsSplit-mouth CCTAutologous dental pulpImplanted into postextraction socketsDental pulp stem/progenitor cells + collagen sponge (n = 7)Collagen sponge (n = 7)7 d; 1, 2, 3, 12 moRate of mineralization (↑); levels of cortical bone (↑); CAL (↓); BMP-2, VEGF (↑)
Tanikawa et al[63], 2020NCT03766217Cleft lip and palateHistorical control studyAutologous deciduous pulpPlaced into the alveolar defect via surgical approachSHED + Hydroxyapatite-collagen sponge (n = 6)rhBMP-2 + Hydroxyapatite-collagen sponge (Group I n = 8); Iliac crest bone graft (Group II n = 8)6, 12 moBone filling percentage (↑, compared with Group I at the 6-mo follow-up)
Manimaran et al[59], 2014NoneMandibular osteoradionecrosisA case reportAllogeneic dental pulpInserted into the defect after surgical curettageDPSCs + PRP + TCP (n = 1)None2, 6 moBone formation (↑)
Manimaran et al[60], 2016NoneBone defect left by the resection of mandibular ameloblastomaA case reportAutologous dental pulpPacked inside the mesh and placed over the mandible after tumor resectionDPSCs + β-TCP + PRF + SVF (n = 1)None1, 10 mo; 1.5 yearsBone regeneration (↑); no recurrence of tumor
Brunelli et al[61], 2013NoneSinus liftingA case reportAutologous dental pulpImplanted into sinus cavityPulp micrografts + Collagen sponge (n = 1)None4 moBMD (↑)
Koga et al[64], 2022NoneErectile dysfunctionCase seriesAllogeneic deciduous pulpInjected into the penisSHED-CM (n = 38)NoneAfter every injectionIIEF-5 score (↑)
Silva et al[65], 2022NCT02728115Huntington’s disease with preexisting pulmonary noduleA case reportAllogeneic deciduous pulpIntravenous administrationsSHED (n = 1)None15, 30 d; 7, 24, 32 moUnified Huntington’s disease rating scale (↓); not show long-term tropism or homing for the lung adenocarcinoma
Wang et al[93], 2010NonePlaque psoriasisA case reportAllogeneic gingivalBolus injectionGMSCs (n = 1)None3 yearsPsoriatic lesions fully cleared; no recurrence
Suda et al[67], 2022NCT04608838; JapicCTI194570Acute ischemic strokeStudy protocolAllogeneic dental pulpIntravenous administrationDPSCsPlaceboPer 15 min (1-4 h); per 30 min (4-6 h); 12, 24 h; 2, 3, 8, 31, 91, 181, 366 dNo results
Nagpal et al[68], 2016NoneChronic disability after strokeStudy protocolAutologous dental pulpImplanted into peri-infarct region via neurosurgical procedureDPSCsNone1, 6, 9, 12 moNo results
Ye et al[69], 2020ChiCTR2000031319: NCT04336254COVID-19Study protocolAllogeneic dental pulpIntravenous administrationDPSCsSaline2 h ± 30 min; 24 h ± 30 min; 90 d ± 3 dNo results