Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Stem Cells. Dec 26, 2020; 12(12): 1591-1602
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i12.1591
Published online Dec 26, 2020. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i12.1591
Table 5 Comparison of electromyographic recording in the three groups
| Variable | Control | rESC | ABMDN |
| Twitch1 height | 2 | 49.5 | 52.9 |
| Twitch2 height | 0.8 | 50 | 48.7 |
| Twitch3 height | 0.8 | 51 | 43.7 |
| Twitch4 height | 0.8 | 42 | 38.9 |
| TOF ratio = (Twitch 4/Twitch 1) × 100 (%) | 47.6 ± 20.3 | 69.33 ± 13.9 | 80.2 ± 11.9 |
| Stimulation current (60 mA) | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Pulse width (200 μs) | 200 | 200 | 200 |
- Citation: Sadat-Ali M, Al-Dakheel DA, Ahmed A, Al-Turki HA, Al-Omran AS, Acharya S, Al-Bayat MI. Spinal cord injury regeneration using autologous bone marrow-derived neurocytes and rat embryonic stem cells: A comparative study in rats. World J Stem Cells 2020; 12(12): 1591-1602
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v12/i12/1591.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v12.i12.1591