Copyright
©2009 Baishideng.
World J Stem Cells. Dec 31, 2009; 1(1): 55-66
Published online Dec 31, 2009. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v1.i1.55
Published online Dec 31, 2009. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v1.i1.55
Fabrication technique | Advantages | Drawbacks |
Laser deposition | Uniform distribution of pore size, simple and fast | Reduced resolution and poor surface finish |
Self assembly | Can generate fibrous networks capable of supporting cells in three dimensions. Cell-seeding problems associated with using prefabricated nanofibrous scaffolds eliminated owing to spontaneous assembly | Lack mechanical strength, Limited amphiphilic materials, random and very short nanofibers |
Lithography | Relatively good resolution | Time consuming and expensive. |
Electrospinning | The properties of electrospun nanofibers, such as fiber diameter, can be controlled readily via manipulation of spinning parameters. Capable of mimicking the stem cell niche | Electrospinning yields a flat mat that has limited three dimensionality and suffers from cell infiltration problems because of the small pore size of the mats |
Phase separation | A nanofibrous (fibers with diameters of 50-500 nm) three-dimensional scaffold can be constructed. Has controllable high porosity, surface-to- volume ratios, and well as defined mechanical properties | Nanofiber distribution and uniformity is subject to the controllability of the processing |
- Citation: Ravichandran R, Liao S, Ng CC, Chan CK, Raghunath M, Ramakrishna S. Effects of nanotopography on stem cell phenotypes. World J Stem Cells 2009; 1(1): 55-66
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v1/i1/55.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v1.i1.55