临床实践
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
世界华人消化杂志. 2024-03-28; 32(3): 236-242
在线出版 2024-03-28. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v32.i3.236
表4 两组血清疼痛介质比较(mean±SD)
指标组别例数T0T4T5T6F时间F组间F交互
NGF舒芬太尼组3932.44±4.1256.83±7.2543.31±6.2236.47±4.2310.36235.27614.338
芬太尼组3932.41±5.0661.27±8.4752.88±7.1345.38±5.98
t0.0292.4876.3167.596
P0.9770.015<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
PGE2舒芬太尼组39134.78±12.83227.83±21.88198.41±18.32150.42±14.3911.02744.36221.337
芬太尼组39135.62±13.14250.14±24.36225.41±20.15187.44±16.33
t0.2864.2556.19210.622
P0.776<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001

引文著录: 陈青林, 葛伟炳, 吴刚, 陆叶兰. 舒芬太尼与芬太尼靶控输注对结直肠癌根治术患者麻醉苏醒质量、肺内氧合及氧化抗氧化系统影响的对比研究. 世界华人消化杂志 2024; 32(3): 236-242