临床实践
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
世界华人消化杂志. 2024-03-28; 32(3): 236-242
在线出版 2024-03-28. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v32.i3.236
表3 两组氧化抗氧化系统指标比较(mean±SD)
指标组别例数T0T4T5T6F时间F组间F交互
MDA(nmol/L)舒芬太尼组397.12±1.185.32±0.855.87±0.926.56±1.1210.84135.96415.669
芬太尼组397.33±1.204.43±0.725.14±0.805.92±0.94
t0.7794.9893.7392.733
P0.438<0.001<0.0010.008<0.001<0.001<0.001
GSH(mg/L)舒芬太尼组39215.14±12.87240.22±20.13230.41±16.94221.46±14.3312.41542.63921.337
芬太尼组39216.94±13.12255.96±22.94242.83±18.41230.89±16.28
t0.6123.2213.1002.715
P0.5430.0020.0030.008<0.001<0.001<0.001
SOD(IU/mL)舒芬太尼组3972.84±5.5681.22±5.1777.14±4.8374.92±3.5914.02348.51625.336
芬太尼组3973.12±5.4184.37±5.2680.41±5.0478.25±4.44
t0.2252.6672.9253.642
P0.8220.0090.005<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001

引文著录: 陈青林, 葛伟炳, 吴刚, 陆叶兰. 舒芬太尼与芬太尼靶控输注对结直肠癌根治术患者麻醉苏醒质量、肺内氧合及氧化抗氧化系统影响的对比研究. 世界华人消化杂志 2024; 32(3): 236-242