临床实践
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
世界华人消化杂志. 2024-03-28; 32(3): 236-242
在线出版 2024-03-28. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v32.i3.236
表1 两组血流动力学比较(mean±SD)
指标组别例数T0T1T2T3F时间F组间F交互
HR(次/min)舒芬太尼组3975.17±3.6884.17±3.8283.65±3.1381.07±3.2812.83456.41520.337
芬太尼组3976.04±4.0189.07±3.2686.77±3.4583.74±3.64
t0.9986.0934.1833.403
P0.321<0.001<0.0010.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
MAP(mmHg)舒芬太尼组3992.12±3.84106.54±4.29101.42±4.12101.43±3.2414.11262.31425.863
芬太尼组3991.79±4.12117.83±5.45107.38±3.87104.27±4.13
t0.36610.1656.5853.379
P0.715<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001

引文著录: 陈青林, 葛伟炳, 吴刚, 陆叶兰. 舒芬太尼与芬太尼靶控输注对结直肠癌根治术患者麻醉苏醒质量、肺内氧合及氧化抗氧化系统影响的对比研究. 世界华人消化杂志 2024; 32(3): 236-242