临床研究
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
世界华人消化杂志. 2018-02-28; 26(6): 365-372
在线出版 2018-02-28. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v26.i6.365
表2 一般临床资料及评分模型分值的比较
项目A组 (n = 90)B组 (n = 64)t/U2P
年龄 (岁)49.74 ± 8.9948.94 ± 8.970.5420.580
性别 (男)88 (97.8)60 (96.8)-2.1830.670
WBC (×109/L)8.3 (5.3,11.8)9.6 (6.2,15.2)-2.1650.000
PLT (×109/L)92.5 (64.5, 151.3)59.0 (36.5, 87.2)3.9460.000
PT (s)21.7 (20.0, 24.5)29.8 (25.0, 37.1)-7.0790.000
INR2.02 ± 0.423.32 ± 1.62-7.2440.000
Na+(mmol/L)131.8 (127.5, 136.0)131.3 (123.9, 134.7)1.9550.067
ALT (U/L)34.0 (22.0, 51.5)36.0 (25.0, 58.0)-0.3210.000
GGT (U/L)150.5 (58.5, 301.0)63.5 (31.7, 126.5)3.5430.000
TBIL (mg/dL)11.0 (6.7, 18.3)12.8 (8.5, 19.8)-1.3160.000
Cr (mg/dL)0.75 ± 0.301.76 ± 1.56-5.9690.000
CTP11.82 ± 1.1912.45 ± 1.59-2.7990.009
MDF46.06 ± 16.4392.62 ± 58.35-7.1770.000
MELD21.44 ± 5.9430.94 ± 9.65-7.5100.000
ABIC7.78 ± 1.079.28 ± 2.29-5.7040.000
CLIF-SOFA6.64 ± 0.819.45 ± 2.04-11.7940.000
28 d死亡率 n (%)17 (19)31 (50)13.7680.002

引文著录: 席蓉蓉, 韩涛, 吕佳昱, 蔡均均. 比较不同评分模型对酒精相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后的评估. 世界华人消化杂志 2018; 26(6): 365-372