Opinion Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2022; 28(14): 1394-1404
Published online Apr 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i14.1394
Table 1 Inclusion criteria among different studies
Ref.
# Patients
Anastomosis location
Inclusion criteria
Type of disease (n)
Neoadjuvant therapy (%)
Weidenhagen et al[7], 200829Lower rectum; Middle rectumLocal peritonitis (20); General peritonitis (9)Cancer of the rectum (22); Rectosigmoid cancer (3); Benign disease (4)9 (40.9)
von Bernstorff et al[27], 200926Lower rectum; IleorectalLocal peritonitisCancer of the rectum + rectosigmoid14 (54)
Riss et al[30], 201020Lower rectum; Middle rectumNot reportedCancer of the rectum6 (30)
van Koperen et al[8], 200916Lower rectum; Ileo-analNot reportedCancer (13); Ulcerative colitis (3)9 (56)
Nerup et al[25], 201313Lower rectumLocal peritonitisCancer6 (46.1)
Mees et al[23], 20085Lower rectumLocal peritonitis Abscess (> 3 cm × 3 cm, or < 10 cm × 10 cm)Cancer of the rectumNo
Arezzo et al[15], 201514Lower rectumLocal peritonitisCancer of the rectum (7); Other (1)7 (50)
Strangio et al[11], 201525Lower rectum (19); Middle rectum (5); Ileoanal (1)Local peritonitis Anastomotic leak less than 270Rectal cancer (18); Endometriosis (1); Left sided colon cancer (4); Diverticulitis (1); Ulcerative colitis (1)18 (84)
Mussetto et al[31], 201711Lower rectum(8); Middle (3)Local peritonitisRectal cancer5 (45)
Keskin et al[13], 2015153 (20)Local peritonitisRectal cancer (12); Other (3)NR
Milito et al[16], 201714Lower rectumLocal peritonitisCancer of the rectum14 (100)
Srinivasamurthy et al[14], 20138Lower rectum; IleoanalNot reportedUlcerative colitis (1); Cancer of the rectum (8)8 (100)
Abdalla et al[24], 202047Middle (5); Lower (42)Local peritonitis + asymptomatic leakCancer of the rectum (44); Other (3)27 (57.4)
Kühn et al[28], 2021281Lower rectum; Ileoanal; Middle rectumLocal peritonitis extraperitoneal anastomotic leak; Rectal defectSigmoid or rectal cancer 183 (65); Other malignancies 50 (18); Diverticular disease 17 (6); Inflammatory bowel disease 12 (4); Perforation 8 (3); Benign/malignant diseases 11 (4)84 (30)
Table 2 Reported complications and treatment among studies reporting complications
Ref.
# Patients
Overall complications n (%)
Type of complication
Treatment
Ileostomy closure %
Weidenhagen et al[7], 20082910 (34.5)10 anastomotic stenosis; 2 fistulasBougienage/balloon dilatation (n = 10); Hartmann procedure for persistent fistula (n = 1)88
von Bernstorff et al[27], 2009262 (7.7)2 intra-abdominal fistulasHartmann procedures (n = 2)NR
Riss et al[30], 2010236 (23)1 stenosis; 5 recurrent abscessDilatation for stenosis (n = 1); Hartmann’s procedure (n = 3); CT-guided drainage (n = 1); No further action (n = 1)76.5
van Koperen et al[8], 2009164 (25)2 abscesses; 1 bleeding; 1 severe pain; 1 anastomotic stenosisHartmann procedure for recurrent abscess (n = 2); 1 stopped treatment for pain; 1 dilatation for stenosis55.6
Nerup et al[25], 2013131 (7.7)1 anastomotic stenosisPermanent colostomy (n = 1)91
Mees et al[23], 200851 (20)1 anastomotic stenosisDilatation (n = 1)20
Arezzo et al[15], 2015141 (14)1 peritonitis; 2 poor complianceFibrin glue injectionNR
Strangio et al[11], 2015253 (12)2 fistulas (1 ureteric, 1 ileal); 1 recurrent abscessSurgery (n = 3)84.6
Mussetto et al[31], 2017112 (18)2 anastomotic stricture1 endoscopic dilatation; 1 stent placement91
Keskin et al[13], 2015153 (20)2 pelvic sepsis; 1 bleedingTreatment discontinued71
Milito et al[16], 2017145 (36)Moderate painNoneNR
Srinivasamurthy et al[14], 201381 (12)Iatrogenic injury during sponge placementEnd stoma64
Abdalla et al[24], 2020474 (8.5)1 intractable pelvic pain; 3 anastomotic stenosisTreatment discontinued (pain); Endoscopic dilatationNR
Kühn et al[28], 202128127 (10)10 anastomotic stenosis; 7 rectovaginal fistulas; 4 bleedingEndoscopic dilatation (n = 10); Surgery (n = 7); Endoscopic haemostasis (n = 3); Surgery for intractable beelding (n = 1)62
Table 3 Assessment of ano-rectal function after treatment of anastomotic leak with endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy
Ref.
# Patients
# Patients with functional assessment
Follow-up time
Instrument to evaluate ano-rectal function
Results
Borstlap et al[17], 201830156, 9, 12 moLARS score; COREFO81% major LARS; 13% minor LARS
Huisman et al[36], 201920132.6 (0.8-3.5) yrLARS score77% major LARS; 23% minor LARS
Katz et al[42], 201864Not reportedNoneReasonable function
Srinivasamurthy et al[14], 20138641 (10-45) moNoneGood or reasonable function
Abdalla et al[24], 2020471714.8 ± 8.9 moLARS score47.1% major LARS; 52.9% no or minor LARS
Rottoli et al[12], 20188 (pouch)711.6 (6-18) moNoneNo feces or gas incontinence; BM: Daytime: 5 (3-8); Nighttime: 1.7 (1-4)
Weréen et al[43], 20201465.9 (0.53-13) yrLARS score67% major LARS