Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2020; 26(41): 6402-6413
Published online Nov 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i41.6402
Table 1 Patients' and procedures' characteristics
All ERCPs (n = 626)PEB (n = 23)Non-PEB (n = 603)P value
Age (yr)66.49 ± 15.471.74 ± 14.266.29 ± 15.40.095a
Male gender [n (%)]291 (46.5%)11 (47.8%)280 (46.4%)0.896b
Native papilla [n (%)]284 (45.4%)14 (60.9%)270 (44.9%)0.130b
Abdominal malignancy at presentation [n (%)]193 (30.8%)9 (39.1%)184 (30.5%)0.380b
Non433 (69.2%)14 (60.9%)419 (69.5%)0.634b
Pancreas147 (23.5%)6 (26.1%)141 (23.4%)
Cholangiocarcinoma24 (3.8%)2 (8.7%)22 (3.6%)
Liver metastases14 (2.2%)1 (4.3%)13 (2.2%)
Other abdominal8 (1.3%)0 (0%)8 (1.3%)
s/p liver transplantation44 (7.0%)0 (0%)44 (7.3%)0.179b
Indications [n (%)]0.337b
Choledocholithiasis201 (32.1%)7 (30.4%)194 (32.2%)
Chronic pancreatitis23 (3.7%)2 (8.7%)21 (3.5%)
Obstructive malignancy98 (15.7%)6 (26.1%)92 (15.3%)
Benign bile duct stricture130 (20.8%)2 (8.7%)128 (21.2%)
Elective stent replacement156 (24.9%)6 (26.1%)150 (24.9%)
Surgical complications18 (2.9%)0 (0%)18 (3.0%)
Procedure characteristics
Duration (minutes)29.09 ± 25.340.87 ± 42.728.64 ± 24.30.02a
Sphincterotomy [n (%)]279 (44.6%)15 (65.2%)264 (43.8%)0.136b
Pre-cut [n (%)]46 (7.3%)2 (8.7%)44 (7.3%)0.772b
TTS dilation [n (%)]33 (5.3%)0 (0%)33 (5.5%)0.249b
Pancreatic stent [n (%)]52 (8.3%)2 (8.7%)50 (8.3%)0.945b
Tandem EUS/ERCP [n (%)]42 (6.7%)5 (21.7%)37 (6.1%)0.003b
Tandem EUS/ERCP + FNA [n (%)]13 (2.1%)4 (17.4%)9 (1.5%)< 0.001b
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression
Univariate logistic regression
Multivariate logistic regression
VariableExp (b)95%CIP valueExp (b)95%CIP value
Gender (male vs female)1.0570.459-2.4340.444
Age at ERCP (yr)1.0270.995-1.0600.096
Native papilla (Yes vs No)1.9130.815-4.4870.136
Obstructive abdominal malignancy (Yes vs No)1.4640.622-3.4430.382
Naïve obstructive malignancy (Yes vs No)1.9600.753-5.1040.168
Antibiotic prophylaxis (Yes vs No)0.3240.075-1.3990.1310.2240.087-1.7750.224
Appropriateness (indicated, appropriate, not indicated)1.0480.514-2.1350.898
Tandem EUS/ERCP (Yes vs No)4.1301.494-12.0840.007
Tandem EUS/ERCP with FNA (Yes vs No)13.8943.928-49.145< 0.00114.5283.571-59.095< 0.001
Sphincterotomy (Yes vs No)2.4081.006-5.7640.051
Precut (Yes vs No)1.2100.275-5.3290.801
TTS dilation (Yes vs No)0.000-1.000
ERCP duration (min)1.0111.001-1.0220.034
Age at ERCP ≥ 75 years (Yes vs No)3.7221.552-8.9250.0033.7801.519-9.4080.004
ERCP duration ≥ 60 minutes (Yes vs No)3.9331.438-10.4320.0065.3961.86-15.6560.002