Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2017; 23(23): 4222-4232
Published online Jun 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4222
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between chronic hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma patients
Clinical factorsCH (n = 59)HCC (n = 72)Total (n = 131)P value
Age, yr, mean ± SD38.9 ± 11.152.3 ± 9.745.7 ± 12.3< 0.001
Gender, male47.40%79.10%64.80%< 0.001
HBeAg negative35.50%54.10%45.80%0.04%
ALT (IU/L), mean ± SD94.5 ± 105.674.2 ± 85.1106.8 ± 191.2NS
AST (IU/L), mean ± SD70.4 ± 92.0127.1 ± 139.8113.2 ± 141.0< 0.001
HBV DNA6.5 ± 2.05.3 ± 1.16.53 ± 1.7< 0.001
HBsAg3.7 ± 0.63.3 ± 0.73.43 ± 0.6< 0.001
Table 2 Correlation between the frequency of potential nucleos(t)ide analog resistance mutation and clinical features
No. of mutationsCH/HCCHBeAg (positive/negative)ALT (IU/L)AST (IU/L)HBV DNAHBsAg
027/2529/23108.51 ± 105.8122.92 ± 106.86.50 ± 6.53.97 ± 3.8
118/1621/13101.61 ± 108.771.42 ± 126.1a6.91 ± 6.43.95 ± 3.8
29/1915/1381.10 ± 113.8113.75 ± 113.06.65 ± 6.13.65 ± 3.9a
34/73/8211.45 ± 97.3205.18 ± 104.8a6.84 ± 6.53.84 ± 3.8
41/42/356.60 ± 108.872.00 ± 114.85.85 ± 6.53.68 ± 3.8
50/11/024.2339.057.492.83
≥ 1 (n = 79)32/4742/37105.81 ± 216.19106.86 ± 131.515.11 ± 1.553.37 ± 0.77
Total (n = 131)59/7271/60107.21 ± 191.16113.2 ± 141.064.98 ± 1.513.43 ± 0.73
Table 3 Characterization of potential 42 NAr mutation from treatment naive Korean patients of genotype C2 infections
CategoryMutationDrug resistanceCHHCCP value
Primary drug resistanceT184A/C/FETV1-0.021
M204I/VLMV, ETV, TNF-9
Mutation number (%)/no. of patients number1/472 (0.21%)9/576 (1.56%)
19 patients
Secondary mutationL80ILMV-5NS
L180MLMV, ETV, LdT12
Mutation number (%)/no. of patients number1/177 (0.56%)7/216 (3.24%)
16
Putative NAr mutationS53NLMV11N.S
L82M/VLMV-1
V84M/IADV1-
H126C/Y/QADV56
I128I/N/ALMV115
R/W153QLMV2-
V191I/DLMV, ADV23
V207ILMV-1
S213TADV-3
Q215P/S/HLMV, ADV-2
L217RADV1-
F221YADV39
L229G/V/WLMV-2
P237HADV-2
N238D/S/TADV36
Mutation number (%)/no. of patients number29/1475 (1.96%)41/1800 (2.27%)
2331
Pre-treatment mutationT38A95NS
Y124HFound46
D134E/N/CBefore48
N139K/HTherapy-8
I224V412
Mutation number (%)/no. of patients number21/351 (5.93%)39/432 (9.02%)
1731
Total Mutation number (%)/no. of patients (%)52/2478 (2.09)96/3024 (3.17)0.003
32 patients (54.2)47 patients (65.2)
148/5502 (2.68)
79 (60.3)
Table 4 Mutation site distributions and mutation rate in different sections of hepatitis B virus RT and overlapped hepatitis B surface antigen regions
Region (amino acid)No. of mutation siteMutation frequencyP value
Reverse transcriptaseDomain (22)9 (40.9)1.07%0.008
A-B interdomain (6)6 (100)7.50%-
Non A-B interdomain (14)10 (71.4)3.16%NS
Total (42)25 (59.5)2.68%-
HBsAgA-determinant (3)2 (66.6)3.81%
Non A-determinant (37)8 (21.6)0.55%< 0.001
Total (40)10 (28.5)0.80%-
Table 5 Frequency and patterns of 3 types of NAr Mutations related to hepatocellular carcinoma
MutationsNo. of patients
Nucleotide sequencesCodons in RT genes (patients)Codons in HBsAg genes (patients)P value
CHHCC
rtL80I05GGCTAT→GGATATCTA(L)→ATA(I) (5)TAT(Y)→TAT(Y) (5)0.036
rtN139K/T/H (sT131N/P)08GGAACC→GGAAACAAC(N)→AAA(K) (4)ACC(T)→AAC(N) (4)
→GGCACC→CAC(H) (3)→ACC(T) (3)0.008
→GGACCC→ACC(T) (1)→CCC(P) (1)
rtM204I/V (sW196L/S/W)09ATATGG→ATATTGATG(M)→ATT(I) (7)TGG(W)→TTG(L) (7)
→ATATCG→ATC(I) (1)→TCG(S) (1)0.004
→ATGTGG→GTG(V) (1)→TGG(W) (1)
Table 6 Comparison of clinical features between patients with or without L80I
Clinical factorsWild type (n = 126)L80I (n = 5)Total (n = 131)P value
Age, yr, mean ± SD45.8 ± 12.257.2 ± 8.145.7 ± 12.30.043
Gender, Male63.50%100%64.80%NS
HBeAg negative45.20%60.00%45.80%NS
ALT (IU/L), mean ± SD84.0 ± 96.868.6 ± 19.7100.8 ± 191.2NS
AST (IU/L), mean ± SD100.9 ± 125.3118.6 ± 65.0113.2 ± 141.0NS
HBV DNA5.8 ± 1.76.7 ± 0.26.5 ± 1.7< 0.001
HBsAg3.4 ± 0.653.5 ± 0.323.4 ± 0.6NS
CH: HCC, HCC (%)59/67 (53.9)0/5 (100)59/72 (54.9)0.036