Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2015; 21(23): 7120-7133
Published online Jun 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7120
Table 1 Risk factors of esophageal stricture formation after endo-therapy
Ref.SettingStudy designPatients (n)Mechanical stenosis and/or symptom(dysphasia)Risk factorAdditional therapy of chemo/radiationFollow-up period (mo)
Ono et al[15]Single centerRetrospective65Necessity of EBDMore than three-fourths of circumferential extension of mucosal defect (OR = 44.2; 95%CI: 4.4-443.6) histologic depth to the LPM cancer (OR = 14.2; 95%CI: 2.7-74.2)ExcludedUnknown
Shi et al[26]Single centerRetrospective362Failure to pass a standard endoscope (11 mm-diameter)More than three-fourths of circumferential extension of mucosal defect (OR = 44.2, 95%CI: 4.4-443.6) depth of invasion above the LPM cancer (OR = 14.2, 95%CI: 2.7-74.2)Excluded41 (16-77)
Takahashi et al[25]Single centerRetrospective76Failure of both symptomatic relief of dysphagia and the passage of a standard endoscope (9.2 mm or 9.0 mm-diameter) without any resistance 4-wk after the last sessionMore than three-fourths of the circumferential extent of mucosal defect (OR = 305.9; 95%CI: 89.387-1046.8)ExcludedStricture group: 30.0 (5-142) nonstricture group: 45.0 (6-174)
Table 2 Results of previous studies on preventive strategies for esophageal stricture after endo-therapy
Ref.Subjects
Stenosis
Dilation therapy
Outcome
Preventive strategyStudy designnTumor stageCircumference of the mucosal defectAdditional therapy of chemo/radiationDifinition of stenosisDysphasia (symptom)Dysphasia scoreIndicationDeviceFollow-up periodStenosis rateTherapeutic ED number
Ezoe et al[41]Preventive EBDCase series, retrospective41T1a-T1bSubcircumference (> 3/4) -circumferenceExcludedNo passage of an endoscope (Φ11 mm)Complaint of dysphagia-Mechanical/symptomaticCRE balloon (four size)Median 84 mo59%4.5 (0-35)
Uno et al[29]Preventive EBD + tranilastCase-control, prospective31T1a-T1b (SM1)Subcircumference (> 3/4) -circumference of the lesionExcludedVomiting at least once a week + no passage of an endoscope (Φ10.8 mm)Dysphagia to regular solid meal+Mechanical + symptomaticCRE balloon (15-18 mm)24.3 ± 7.4 mo33.30%0.0 (0.0-1.75)
Wen et al[61]Fully covered metalic stentCohort study, prospective22T1a-T1b (SM1)Subcircumference (> 3/4) -circumferenceExcludedNo passage of an endoscope (Φ9.8 mm)Persistent dysphagia to regular solid meal-MechanicalSavary-Gilliard dilator12 wk18.20%0.45 (0-3)
Hashimoto et al[71]Local injection of steroidCase-control, retrospective41T1a-T1b (SM3)Subcircumference (> 3/4)IncludedComplaint of dysphasia/no passage of an endoscope (Φ11.4 mm)Complaint of dysphagia-MechanicalCRE balloon (unclear)Unclear19.00%1.7 (0-15)
Hanaoka et al[72]Local injection of steroidCohort study, prospective59T1a-T1bSubcircumference (> 3/4)Included (chemotherapy)Dysphagia to some solids/no passage of an endoscope (Φ9.2 mm)Dysphagia to some solids+SymptomaticUnclear8 wk10%0 (0-2)
Yamaguchi et al[65]Systemic administration of steroidCohort study, retrospective41T1a-T1b (SM1)Subcircumference (> 3/4) -circumferenceExcludedUnclearComplaint of dysphagia-SymptomaticCRE balloon (15-18 mm)3 mo5.30%
6-12 mo1.7 (0-7)
Sato et al[77]Systemic administration of steroid + EBDCohort study, retrospective23T1a-T1b (SM3)CircumferenceIncludedResistence/failure to pass an endoscope (Φ9.9 mm)--MechanicalCRE baloon (15-18 mm)No fininition-13.8 ± 6.9
Ohki et al[98]Autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheetsSingle-arm9UnknownSubcircumference (> 2/3)UnknownNo definition-+MechanicalUnclear--2.33 (0-21)
Sakaguchi et al[106]PGACase series, prospective8T1a-T1b (SM2)Subcircumference (> 3/4)UnknownFailure to pass a endoscope (Φ9.8 mm)Symptoms of dysphasia-MechanicalCRE balloon (12-18 mm)No definition37.5 % (about 28 POD)0.8 ± 1.2
Iizuka et al[107]PGACase series, prospective15T1a-T1b (SM2)Subcircumference (> 1/2)ExcludedUnclearUnclear-UnclearEBD (unclear)6 wk7.70%5