Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2015; 21(12): 3711-3719
Published online Mar 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3711
Table 1 Characteristics of studies for dietary cholesterol included in the meta-analysis
Ref.Country (year)Study designMean age (case/control)Percentage of males (case/control)Sample size (cases)Cut-points for cholesterol exposure RR (95%CI)Adjustment for covariates
Lin et al[13]JapanCase-control64.7/65.1327Dietary cholesterol exposure (mg), < 206 (referent), 206-330,Age and pack-years of smoking
-2005NA-109> 330 [2.06 (1.11-3.85)]
Chan et al[14]United StatesCase-controlNA2233Dietary cholesterol exposure (g/d) median, 122.8 (referent), 192.6, 257.6, 368.9 [1.5 (1.1-2.0)]Age, sex, BMI, race, education, smoking, history of diabetes and energy intake
-200754.7/51.9-532
Hu J et al[15]CanadaCase-control61.6/57.15667Dietary cholesterol cut-pointAge, sex, BMI, province, education, alcohol drinking, pack year smoking, total of vegetable and fruit intake, saturated fat and total energy intake
-201256.2/50.5-628(mg/wk) < 966.261 (referent), 966.262-1412.753, 1412.754-1880.265,
> 1880.266 [1.57 (1.09-2.26)]
Howe et al[17]Metropolitan TorontoCase-control64.6/64.8754Mean difference per dayCaloric and fibre intake, lifetime cigarette consumption
-199056.6/53.5-249quartile 4-quartile 1 (569 mg) [0.95 (0.51-1.75)]
Bueno de Mesquita et al[18]NetherlandsCase-controlNA644Dietary cholesterolAge, sex, response status, total smoking and dietary intake of energy
-199154.9/48.3-164[1.33 (0.72-2.45)]
Lucenteforte et al[19]ItalyCase-controlNA978First quintile of cholesterol exposure (referent), second vs first,Year of interview, education, tobacco smoking, history of diabetes and total energy intake
-201053.4/53.4-326third vs first, fourth vs first,
fifth vs first [1.10 (0.68-1.77)]
Baghurst et al[26]AustraliaCase-controlNA357First quintile of cholesterol exposure (referent), second vs first, third vs first, fourth vs first [3.19 (1.58-6.47)]Age and pack-years of smoking
-199150.0/56.1-104
Ghadirian et al[27]CanadaCase-control63.9/62.1418First quintile of cholesterol exposure (referent), second vs first, third vs first, fourth vs first [2.24 (0.83-6.05)]Age, sex, lifetime cigarette consumption, response status and total energy intake
-199554.2/51.5-179
Heinen et al[28]The NetherlandsCase-cohortNA120852Dietary cholesterol (mg/d), first quintile of cholesterol exposure (referent), second vs first, third vs first, fourth vs first, fifth vs first [0.78 (0.52-1.18)]Age, sex, BMI, energy, smoking, alcohol, history of diabetes mellitus, history of hypertension, vegetables and fruits intake
-200952.9/49.1-350
Kalapothaki et al[29]GreeceCase-controlNA362Dietary cholesterol (mg), an increment of about one standard deviation of the energy-adjusted residual of the corresponding nutritional variable [1.19 (0.96-1.47)]Age, sex, hospital, past residence, years of schooling, smoking, diabetes mellitus and energy intake
-1993NA-181
Michaud et al[30]United StatesCohortNA88802Median of cholesterol exposure (g/d) 212 (referent), 275, 322, 371, 466 [1.11 (0.67-1.83)]Pack-years of smoking, BMI, history of diabetes mellitus, caloric intake, height, physical activity, menopausal status and glycemic load intake
-2003NA-178
Nöthlings et al[31]Hawaii and Los AngelesCohort65/60190545Cholesterol density (mg/1000 kcal per day) median intake 56.8 (referent), 81.6, 100.4, 120.8, 156.8 [1.09 (0.89-1.32)]Age, ethnicity, history of diabetes mellitus, familial history of pancreatic cancer, smoking status and energy intake
-200551.2/45.3-482
Stolzenberg-Solomon et al[32]FinlandCohort58/5727111First quintile of cholesterol exposure (referent), second vs first,Energy intake, age, years of smoking and energy-adjusted saturated fat intake
-2002NA-163third vs first, fourth vs first,
fifth vs first [0.92 (0.53-1.59)]
Zatonski et al[33]PolandCase-control62.2/63.2305First quintile of cholesterol exposure (referent), second vs first, third vs first, fourth vs first [4.31 (1.60-11.59)]Cigarette lifetime consumption and calories
-199161.8/45.6-110
Table 2 Characteristics of studies for serum total cholesterol included in the meta-analysis
Ref.Country (year)Study designMean age (case/control) Percentage of males (case/control)Sample size (cases)Cut-points for cholesterol Exposure RR (95%CI)Adjustment for covariates
Wu et al[16]China (2012)Case-control59.3/59.358.6/58.6840(210)Serum TC < 5.70 mmol/L (referent),≥ 5.70 mmol/L [1.793 (1.067-3.013)]Age, sex, hypertension, HBV markers, the levels of HDL, LDL, Tri and Apo B
Stolzenberg-Solomon et al[20]Finland (2002)CohortNA29048(172)Serum TC < 5.18 mmol/L (referent),≥ 5.18 mmol/L [0.88 (0.60-1.28)]Age, years smoked, cigarettes smoked per day, self-reported history of diabetes andbronchial asthma, occupational activity and measured high blood pressure
Johansen et al[21]Austria, Norway, and Sweden (2010)CohortNA289866(543)Serum TC mean level (mmol/L) 4.5 (referent), 5.3, 5.8, 6.4, 7.6 [0.70 (0.53-0.93)]Age, BMI and smoking status
Johansen et al[21]Austria, Norway, and Sweden (2010)CohortNA288834(314)Serum TC mean level (mmol/L) 4.4 (referent), 5.1, 5.7, 6.3, 1.11 [0.75 (0.53-1.64)]Age, BMI and smoking status
Kitahara et al[34]South Korea (2011)CohortNA756604(1799)Serum TC (mg/dL) < 160 (referent), 160-179, 180-199, 200-239, ≥ 240 [0.88 (0.74-1.05)]Smoking, drinking, fasting serum glucose,BMI, hypertension and physical activity
Kitahara et al[34]South Korea (2011)CohortNA433115(776)Serum TC (mg/dL) < 160 (referent), 160-179, 180-199, 200-239, ≥ 240 [0.96 (0.74-1.24)]Smoking, drinking, fasting serum glucose,BMI, hypertension and physical activity
Kuzmickiene et al[35]Lithuania (2013)CohortNA6788(73)Serum TC (mmol/L) < 5.20 (referent), 5.20-5.89, 5.90-6.62, ≥ 6.63 [1.76 (0.87-3.55)]Age, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption and education
Xu et al[36]China (2011)Case-control61.4/60.7459.3/60.5602(290)Serum TC (mmol/L) < 5.72 (referent), ≥ 5.72 [1.01 (0.88-1.17)]Diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, family history of cancer, history of gastrointestinal surgery, history of biliary disease, history of chronic pancreatitis and triglyceride
Table 3 Pooled relative risks of associations between pancreatic cancer and dietary cholesterol and serum total cholesterol
Cholesterol sourceSubgroupNo. of studiesPooled RR (95%CI) REMI2Pheterogeneity
Dietary cholesterolAll studies141.308 (1.097-1.559)55.3%0.006
After excluding two studies[24,31] (RR > 3.0)121.204 (1.050-1.380)29.4%0.158
Study design
Case-control101.523 (1.226-1.893)49.7%0.037
Cohort41.023 (0.871-1.200)0.0%0.508
Continent
North America61.275 (1.058-1.537)29.3%0.215
Europe61.149 (0.863-1.531)55.4%0.047
Others22.495 (1.565-3.977)0.0%0.362
Serum TCAll studies81.003 (0.859-1.171)55.5%0.028
Continent
Europe41.034 (0.722-1.481)65.1%0.035
Asia41.005 (0.847-1.192)56.2%0.077