Retrospective Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2014; 20(32): 11356-11362
Published online Aug 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11356
Table 1 Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics in the tacrolimus and cyclosporine A groups n (%)
Total (n = 689)TAC (n = 529)CSA (n = 160)P value
Age (yr)44.94 ± 9.6844.70 ± 9.2545.73 ± 10.98NS
Gender (male/female)575/114448/81127/33NS
Donor type (DDLT/LDLT)511/178368/161143/17< 0.001
MELD score13.77 ± 7.7713.54 ± 7.9614.54 ± 7.07NS
Pre-LT renal dysfunction61 (8.9)46 (8.7)15 (9.4)NS
Post-LT AKI108 (15.7)80 (15.1)28 (17.5)NS
Post-LT AR78 (11.3)53 (10.0)25 (15.6)NS
Post-LT CR18 (2.6)13 (2.5)5 (3.1)NS
Primary diagnosisNS
Tumors344 (49.9)265 (50.1)79 (49.4)
Cirrhosis232 (33.7)182 (34.4)50 (31.3)
Chronic active hepatitis54 (7.8)36 (6.8)18 (11.3)
Others59 (8.6)46 (8.7)13 (8.1)
Viral infectionNS
HBV infection564 (81.9)435 (82.2)129 (80.6)
HCV infection9 (1.3)8 (1.5)1 (0.6)
Table 2 Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics in the tacrolimus group n (%)
Total (n = 529)Low-dose TAC (n = 113)Low-dose TAC with MMF (n = 235)High-dose TAC (n = 61)High-dose TAC with MMF (n = 120)P value
Age (yr)44.00 ± 9.2545.00 ± 9.6144.86 ± 9.2142.93 ± 8.8344.98 ± 9.20NS
Gender448/8195/18200/3551/10102/18NS
Donor type368/161102/11143/9249/1274/46< 0.001
MELD score13.54 ± 7.9615.03 ± 8.3413.15 ± 7.8513.48 ± 6.5912.94 ± 8.37NS
Renal dysfunction pre-LT46 (8.7)15 (13.3)16 (6.8)8 (13.1)7 (5.8)NS
Post-LT AKI80 (15.1)22 (19.5)33 (14.0)11 (18.0)14 (11.7)NS
Post-LT AR53 (10.0)15 (13.3)18 (7.7)10 (16.4)10 (8.3)NS
Post-LT CR13 (2.5)3 (2.7)5 (2.1)2 (3.2)3 (2.5)NS
Primary diagnosisNS
Tumors265 (50.1)61 (54.0)107 (45.5)35 (57.4)62 (51.7)
Cirrhosis182 (34.4)39 (34.5)89 (37.9)17 (27.9)37 (30.8)
Chronic active hepatitis36 (6.8)9 (8.0)12 (5.1)4 (6.6)11 (9.2)
Others46 (8.7)4 (3.5)27 (11.5)5 (8.2)10 (8.3)
Viral infectionNS
HBV infection435 (82.2)95 (84.1)191 (81.3)48 (78.7)101 (84.2)
HCV infection8 (1.5)2 (1.8)6 (2.6)00