Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2014; 20(32): 11182-11198
Published online Aug 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11182
Table 1 Selected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma genetic risk factors
Risk factorGeneIncreased PDAC riskOther associated cancers
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromeBRCA1, BRCA2, PALB22-3.5Breast, ovarian, prostate
Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer)MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM8.6Colon, endometrium, ovary, stomach, small intestine, urinary tract, brain, cutaneous sebaceous glands
Familial adenomatous polyposisAPC4.5-6Colon, desmoid, duodenum, thyroid, brain, ampullary, hepatoblastoma
Peutz-Jeghers syndromeSTK11/LKB1132Esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, lung, breast, uterus, ovary
Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma pancreatic carcinoma syndromeP16INK4A/CDKN2A47Melanoma
Hereditary pancreatitisPRSS1, SPINK169
Cystic fibrosisCFTR3.5
Ataxia-telangiectasiaATMIncreasedLeukemia, lymphoma
Non-O blood group1.3
Familial pancreatic cancerUnknown9 (1 FDR) 32 (3 FDRs)
Table 2 Selected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma modifiable risk factors
Risk factorIncreased PDAC risk
Current cigarette use1.7-2.2
Current pipe or cigar use1.5
> 3 alcoholic drinks per day1.2-1.4
Chronic pancreatitis13.3
BMI > 40 kg/m2, male1.5
BMI > 40 kg/m2, female2.8
Diabetes mellitus, type 12.0
Diabetes mellitus, type 21.8
Cholecystectomy1.2
Gastrectomy1.5
Helicobacter pylori infection1.4
Table 3 Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas screening efforts and diagnostic yields n (%)
Ref.Number screenedHigh-risk groupInitial imaging (if abnormal screening)Diagnostic yieldDefinition of diagnostic yield
Brentnall et al[182]14FPCEUS + ERCP + CT7 (50)Dysplasia
Rulyak et al[183]35FPCIf symptomatic: EUS + ERCP If asymptomatic: EUS (ERCP)12 (34.3)Dysplasia
Kimmey et al[184]46FPCEUS (ERCP)12 (26)Dysplasia
Canto et al[185]38FPC, PJSEUS (CT, ERCP, EUS-FNA)2 (5.3)PDAC, IPMN
Canto et al[186]78FPC, PJSEUS + CT (ERCP, EUS-FNA)8 (10.3)IPMN, PanIN1-2
Poley et al[187]44FPC, BRCA, PJS, FAMMM, p53, HPEUS (CT, MRI)10 (23)PDAC, IPMN on imaging
Langer et al[188]76FPC, BRCA, FAMMMEUS + MRCP (EUS)1 (1.3)IPMN
Verna et al[181]51FPC, PJS, FAMMM, BRCA, HP, HNPCCEUS and/or MRCP (EUS-FNA, ERCP)6 (12)1PDAC, IPMN, multifocal PanIN2-3
Ludwig et al[189]109FPC, BRCAMRCP (EUS)9 (8.3)PDAC, IPMN, PanIN2-3, SCA on imaging
Vasen et al[190]79p16MRI/MRCP, EUS if unable7 (8.9)PDAC
Al-Sukhni et al[191]262FPC, FDR of double-primary cancer, BRCA, PJS, HP, p16MRI (ERCP, EUS, CT)3 (1.1)2PDAC
Schneider et al[33]72FPC, BRCA, PALB2, p16EUS + MRCP (EUS)4 (5.5)MD-IMPN, multifocal PanIN23
9 (12.5)MD-IMPN, multifocal PanIN2-3, BD-IPMN
Canto et al[174]216FPC, BRCA, PJSCT + MRI/MRCP + EUS (ERCP)92 (42.6)Pancreatic lesion
Table 4 Selected highlights
Selected recent advancesGenetic risk factors
In 2009, the use of gene sequencing identified PALB2, which had previously been implicated in breast cancer, as a susceptibility gene for PDAC[28]
Expression of the palladin gene has been shown to be upregulated by cohabitance of normal fibroblasts with epithelial cells expressing the K-Ras oncogene. In 2012, it was shown that the palladin gene, which codes for a cytoskeletal protein, promotes mechanisms for metastasis and outgrowth of tumerogenic cells[90]
Also in 2012, gene sequencing indicated that ATM mutations result in a predisposition to PDAC; LOH was demonstrated in 2 kindreds with PDAC[77]
Therapy
For patients with diabetes, treatment with metformin is associated with a lower relative risk of pancreatic cancer[127,136,137]
A 2011 case report detailing a complete pathological response of a BRCA2-associated pancreatic tumor to gemcitabine plus iniparib showed the potential for PARP inhibitors in the treatment of BRCA2-associated pancreatic cancer[41]. Similar clinical trials are currently underway
ScreeningScreening goals
The goal of PDAC screening is the detection and treatment of (1) resectable PDAC; (2) PanIN-3 lesions; and (3) IPMN with high-grade dysplasia
Low prevalence and high risk cohort enrichment
The low absolute risk of PDAC development precludes population-wide screening from a cost-benefit and absolute harm perspective. The opportunity to screen high-risk cohorts will vastly increase the PPV of a screening test
Screening efforts
Past screening efforts, using patients cohorts at a high risk of developing PDAC, have demonstrated diagnostic yields from 1.1% to 50%, depending on their definition of yield (Table 3). Current screening modalities may be costly and invasive, and therefore associated with some patient risk. Furthermore, the long-term implications for detection of small and clinically insignificant lesions are uncertain. Further studies are needed to determine appropriate surveillance
Anticipated future advances and screening possibilitiesRisk stratification
Personal, family, genetic and environmental history will allow risk stratification and development of tailored screening and surveillance programs
Biomarkers
Ongoing research that suggests a future for gene expression profiling, proteomics, metabolomics, and microRNA as diagnostic PDAC biomarkers
Targeted therapy
As with BRCA2-associated tumors and PARP inhibitors, tumor biology will increasingly dictate the subsequent therapy