Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2014; 20(25): 8110-8118
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8110
Table 1 Citations of routine drainage studies
PreferenceRef.CountryStudy designnPD
Removed earlyKawai et al[60], 2006JapanTime cohort104104
Selective routine drainageJeekel et al[73], 1992NetherlandsProspective case report2222
Heslin et al[74], 1998United StatesRetrospective8989
Lim et al[72], 2013FranceCase-control analysis5454
Mehta et al[93], 2013United StatesRetrospective709709
Correa-Gallego et al[75], 2013United StatesRetrospective1122739
No routine drainageVan Buren et al[79], 2013United StatesRandomized prospective137137
Table 2 Studies comparing selective routine drainage with selective no-drainage n (%)
Ref.PatientsDrainNo drainPancreatic fistula
Complications
Possible reasons for drainage
DrainNo drainP valueDrainNo drainP value
Heslin et al[74]8951383 (6)1 (3)0.3023 (45)15 (39)0.60Anesthesia time
Lim et al[72]5427276 (22)0 (0)0.00913 (48)6 (22)0.09Hard pancreas and dilated main pancreatic duct
Mehta et al[93]70925145861 (24)48 (11)  < 0.0001171 (68)248 (54)  < 0.0001Operation type and blood loss
Correa-Gallego et al[75]739386353104 (27)59 (17)0.001NANANABile duct diameter, blood loss, and operation time