Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2012; 18(25): 3296-3302
Published online Jul 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i25.3296
Table 1 Expression of caudal-related homeobox transcription factor in gastric carcinoma and precancerous tissues
TypeCasesCdx2 positive cases%χ2P value
Different subtypes of intestinal metaplasia11610187.133.8260.000
IM (type I)80729031.4000.000
IM (type II)2017857.4260.003
IM (type III)1612755.3650.012
Dysplasia7236500.0040.873
Mild391743.50.0830.700
Moderate2011550.0880.637
Severe13861.50.3550.553
Gastric carcinoma854148.2
Table 2 Relationship between expression of caudal-related homeobox transcription factor and clinical pathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma
Pathological parametersnCdx2positive casesPositiverate (%)χ2P value
Gender0.0710.642
Male603050
Female251144
Age (yr)0.0001.000
≥ 55572849.1
< 55281346.4
Lauren classification13.5440.001
Intestinal432967.4
Diffuse35925.7
Mixed type7342.9
Differentiation9.9910.001
Well and moderately differentiated442965.9
Poorly differentiated and mucinous adenocarcinoma411229.3
Depth of invasion5.6300.131
T19777.8
T211545.5
T3251456
T4401537.5
Lymph node metastasis5.0890.017
No362363.9
Yes491836.7
Clinical stages5.1020.018
 I + II191473.7
III + IV662740.9
Table 3 Association of various factors with overall survival by the logistic regression
VariablesBSEWaltExp (B)P value
Cdx2-1.2900.39710.5860.2750.001
Lymph node metastasis0.8080.3445.5012.2430.019