Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2010; 16(42): 5324-5328
Published online Nov 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5324
Table 1 Patient demographics n (%)
No. of patients (n = 199)
Age (yr)168.0 ± 11.4
Sex
M119 (59.8)
F80 (40.2)
Polyp location
Cecum49 (20.5)
Ascending colon30 (12.6)
Transverse colon26 (10.9)
Descending colon34 (14.2)
Sigmoid colon43 (18.0)
Rectum57 (23.8)
Total239
Polyp size (mm)168.0 ± 11.4
Range (mm)10-80
Table 2 Characteristics of polyps according to histopathology n (%)
Non-adenomasAdenomasCarcinoma-in-situ
Age (yr)161.3 ± 12.969.2 ± 9.976.2 ± 11.2
Sex
M151179
F23644
Polyp size (mm)113.9 ± 5.220.8 ± 13.122.7 ± 14.9
Polyp location
Cecum13 (34.2)31 (17.1)2 (15.4)
Ascending colon5 (13.2)24 (13.3)0
Transverse colon9 (23.7)15 (8.3)1 (7.7)
Descending colon4 (10.5)29 (16.0)0
Sigmoid colon6 (15.8)33 (18.2)3 (2.3)
Rectum1 (2.6)49 (27.1)7 (5.4)
Total3818113
Resection method
En bloc33 (86.8)129 (71.3)9 (69.2)
Piecemeal5 (13.2)50 (27.6)4 (30.8)
Not recorded02 (1.1)0
Complete resection
Yes36 (94.7)154 (85.1)10 (76.9)
No2 (5.3)26 (14.4)3 (23.1)
Not recorded01 (0.5)0
Recurrence2
No75 (48.8)1 (10.0)
Yes30 (19.4)3 (30.0)
No follow up49 (31.8)6 (60.0)
Table 3 Hazard ratio for risk of recurrence associated with clinical variables (n = 164)
Hazard ratio95% CIP1
Age1.0360.982-1.0930.194
Sex0.8510.301-2.4030.761
Size1.0230.974-1.0740.357
Resection method (en bloc vs piecemeal)0.6800.188-2.4520.555
Histology0.004
MGD vs LGD2.8370.358-22.4990.324
HGD vs LGD2.0090.206-19.6300.549
CIS vs LGD186.6518.813-3953.0200.001
Site (distal colon vs right and transverse colon)5.9331.345-26.1750.019