Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2007; 13(27): 3738-3741
Published online Jul 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i27.3738
Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients n (%)
CharacteristicsDrain groupNo-drain groupP value
(n = 56)(n = 52)
Age (yr)54.34 ± 11.2357.54 ± 13.450.859
Sex (male:female36:2033:190.864
Tumor stage0.468
IA4 (7.14)3 (5.76)
IB6 (10.71)4 (9.61)
II11 (19.64)13 (25.00)
IIIA11 (19.64)10 (19.23)
IIIB9 (16.07)10 (19.23)
IV15 (26.78)12 (23.07)
Operation type0.284
Radical38 (67.85)37 (71.15)
Palliative18 (32.14)15 (28.84)
LN dissection0.352
D120 (35.71)17 (32.69)
D236 (64.28)35 (67.31)
Table 2 Comparison of surgical outcomes between the two groups
Surgical outcomesDrain groupNo-drain groupP value
(n = 56)(n = 52)
Operating time (min)171.4 ± 42155.6 ± 390.096
Passage of flatus (POD)3.67 ± 0.573.52 ± 0.950.495
Initiation of soft diet (POD)4.87 ± 0.724.82 ± 0.840.314
Hospital stay (POD)9.32 ± 2.218.39 ± 2.350.402
Complications, n (%)0.324
None44 (78.57)42 (80.76)
Wound infection4 (7.14)4 (7.69)
Pulmonary infection7 (12.50)6 (11.53)
Wound dehiscence2 (3.57)2 (3.84)
Fever7 (12.50)6 (11.53)
Anastomotic leak1 (1.78)1 (1.92)
Others18 (10.71)6 (7.69)
Drain-related complications4 (7.14)0
Hospital mortality, n (%)3 (5.35)2 (3.84)0.284