Copyright
©The Author(s) 2003.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 15, 2003; 9(9): 1985-1989
Published online Sep 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i9.1985
Published online Sep 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i9.1985
Case | Classificatory diagnosis | |
Japanese (5) | Chinese (5) | |
1 | IIa + IIc (5) | Is (4), IIa + IIc (1) |
2 | IIa + IIc (4), Isp + llc (1) | Isp (3), Isp + IIc (1), IIa (1) |
3 | IIc + IIa (3), IIc (2) | IIc + IIa (4), IIc (1) |
4 | IIc + IIa (3), IIa + IIc (1), IIa + dep. (1) | IIa + IIc (3), IIc + IIa (2) |
5 | IIa + dep. (3), IIa (2) | IIa + IIc (3), IIa (2) |
6 | Ip + IIc (4), IIa + IIc (1) | Ip (3), Ip + IIc (1), IIa + IIc (1) |
7 | LST (3), IIa agg. (2) | IIa |
8 | IIa (3), LST (2) | IIb (3), IIa (2) |
9 | LST (3), IIa (1), IIc (1) | IIc (3), IIb (1), IIa + IIc (1) |
10 | LST (3), IIa (1), IIc + IIa (1) | IIc + IIa (4), IIa (1) |
- Citation: Zhu RM, Wang FY, Hirata I, Katsu KI, Xiao SD, Yu ZL, Zhang ZH, Xu ZM. Differences in endoscopic classification of early colorectal carcinoma between China and Japan: A comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(9): 1985-1989
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v9/i9/1985.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v9.i9.1985