Copyright
©The Author(s) 2003.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 15, 2003; 9(4): 843-846
Published online Apr 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.843
Published online Apr 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.843
Table 1 Grouping of patients
| CON (n = 30) | TPN (n = 40) | EN (n = 65) | |||||||
| Cases | Grade | Cases | Grade | Cases | Grade | ||||
| B | C | B | C | B | C | ||||
| PVH | 13 | 10 | 3 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 21 | 10 | 11 |
| HCC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| CLA | 1 | - | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | - | 8 |
| ROBD | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 5 | 10 |
| CLT | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 |
| Others | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 1 |
- Citation: Hu QG, Zheng QC. The influence of Enteral Nutrition in postoperative patients with poor liver function. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(4): 843-846
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v9/i4/843.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.843