Copyright
©The Author(s) 2003.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 15, 2003; 9(4): 635-640
Published online Apr 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.635
Published online Apr 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.635
Authors | Entry criteria | Treatment protocol | Sample size | Observation | DFS | OS | Conclusions |
(Tx/Ctl) | time | Tx vs Ctl | Tx vs Ctl | ||||
Une[30] | NA | A ia vs A + LAK and IL2 ia | 24 (12/12) | NA | 50% vs 8.3% | NA | Beneficial |
Kawata[31] | NA | A ia vs A + IL2 + LAK ia | 24 (12/12) | NA | NS | NA | Not beneficial |
Lygidakis[32] | NA | No Tx vs | 40 (20/20) | NA | Recurrence: | NA | Beneficial |
Chemoimmunotherapy | 0/18 vs 7/17 | ||||||
Takayama[1] | Completely remove; | LAK IV at the 2nd, | 155 (76/79) | > 5 years | 3-year | 5-year | Beneficial |
histologically negative | 3rd, 4th, 12th, 24th week | 48% vs 33% | 68% vs 62% | ||||
in surgical margin | after operation | 5 year 37% vs 22% |
- Citation: Sun HC, Tang ZY. Preventive treatments for recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma - A literature review of randomized control trials. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(4): 635-640
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v9/i4/635.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.635