Basic Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 15, 2003; 9(10): 2270-2273
Published online Oct 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i10.2270
Table 1 Effect of different nutrition support methods on se-rum glucose, calcium amylase and lysosomal enzymes
GroupsTimeGlu (μmol/L)Ca (mmol/L)Amylase (SU)LE (U)
PN groupPre-AP4.0 ± 0.52.50 ± 0.10328 ± 9622 ± 10
30 min8.3 ± 0.8a2.42 ± 0.11636 ± 100a53 ± 11
1 d9.7 ± 0.7a2.35 ± 0.091689 ± 298a68 ± 17
4 d10.3 ± 1.0a2.36 ± 0.131150 ± 416a45 ± 14
7 d9.80 ± 1.1a2.20 ± 0.111060 ± 260a47 ± 13
EIN groupPre-AP4.7 ± 0.82.34 ± 0.16400 ± 11026 ± 9
30 min8.4 ± 1.0a2.39 ± 0.11734 ± 16464 ± 17
1 d8.9 ± 0.8a2.31 ± 0.091289 ± 439b71 ± 13
4 d6.7 ± 1.02.34 ± 0.151215 ± 41650 ± 19
7 d6.6 ± 0.72.30 ± 0.091169 ± 36252 ± 20