Copyright
©The Author(s) 2001.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 15, 2001; 7(1): 74-79
Published online Feb 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i1.74
Published online Feb 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i1.74
Region | Thickness (mm) | Proliferation area/total area (%) | ||||
Cordis stent | Wallstent | P value* | Cordis stent | Wallstent | P value* | |
Hepatic | 2.04 ± 1.28 | 1.85 ± 0.96 | 0.66 | 57.49 ± 23.60 | 51.43 ± 24.61 | 0.74 |
Middle | 1.42 ± 0.82 | 1.31 ± 0.87 | 0.63 | 49.89 ± 17.31 | 47.91 ± 20.12 | 0.60 |
Portal | 2.46 ± 0.98 | 2.38 ± 0.23 | 0.61 | 71.88 ± 21.18 | 69.97 ± 29.45 | 0.57 |
Average | 2.18 ± 1.07 | 2.00 ± 0.02 | 0.73 | 59.18 ± 23.06 | 51.66 ± 25.11 | 0.78 |
- Citation: Teng GJ, Bettmann MA, Hoopes PJ, Yang L. Comparison of a new stent and Wallstent for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in a porcine model. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7(1): 74-79
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v7/i1/74.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v7.i1.74