Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2025; 31(6): 102090
Published online Feb 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i6.102090
Published online Feb 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i6.102090
Table 2 Medical experts evaluation scores criteria
Evaluation dimension | Score | Scoring criteria |
Accuracy | 1 | The answer contains serious errors or misleading information that may harm patients |
2 | The answer contains some errors or inaccurate information, but it will not cause obvious harm to patients | |
3 | The information in the answer is mostly accurate, but there are a few ambiguous or uncertain statements | |
4 | The information in the answer is accurate, clearly stated, and without obvious errors | |
5 | The information in the answer is highly accurate, professionally and authoritatively stated, and fully consistent with current medical knowledge | |
Completeness | 1 | The answer is very brief, missing key information, and provides little to no help for the patient's actual question |
2 | Although the answer mentions some relevant content, it lacks a significant amount of important information and provides limited help to the patient | |
3 | The answer covers the main relevant content but still omits some important information, making the guidance for the patient not comprehensive enough | |
4 | The answer covers most of the key content, and although it may omit a small amount of minor information, it is already very helpful to the patient | |
5 | The answer is very complete, covering all key information and providing a comprehensive answer to the patient's question | |
Correlation | 1 | The answer is almost completely unrelated to the patient's actual question, and the information lacks targeting |
2 | Although some content in the answer is related to the question, most of the information deviates from the main topic and lacks targeting | |
3 | The main point of the answer is basically related to the patient's question, but there is a small amount of irrelevant or off-topic content | |
4 | The answer closely follows the patient's question, and almost all content is directly related, but there may be a few pieces of irrelevant information | |
5 | The answer is completely on-topic, and all content is highly relevant to the patient's question, making the information very targeted |
- Citation: Zhang Y, Wan XH, Kong QZ, Liu H, Liu J, Guo J, Yang XY, Zuo XL, Li YQ. Evaluating large language models as patient education tools for inflammatory bowel disease: A comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(6): 102090
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i6/102090.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i6.102090