Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2025; 31(5): 98928
Published online Feb 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.98928
Published online Feb 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.98928
Table 3 Performance of protocols A, B, C, D, and three consecutive interval whole-mount slide images at the tumor center for detecting microvascular invasion in 15 specimens, using protocol E as the reference standard
Metrics | Protocol A | Protocol B | WSI3/protocol C/protocol D |
Positive rate | 0.40 (6/15) | 0.53 (8/15) | 0.60 (9/15) |
Accuracy | 0.47 (0.22-0.73) | 0.60 (0.33-0.83) | 0.67 (0.39-0.87) |
Sensitivity | 0.43 (0.19-0.70) | 0.57 (0.30-0.81) | 0.64 (0.36-0.86) |
Specificity | 1.00 (0.05-1.00) | 1.00 (0.05-1.00) | 1.00 (0.05-1.00) |
Positive predictive value | 1.00 (0.52-1.00) | 1.00 (0.60-1.00) | 1.00 (0.63-1.00) |
Negative predictive value | 0.11 (0.01-0.49) | 0.14 (0.01-0.58) | 0.17 (0.01-0.64) |
False negative rate | 0.57 (0.30-0.81) | 0.43 (0.19-0.70) | 0.36 (0.14-0.64) |
- Citation: Li LJ, Wu CQ, Ye FL, Xuan Z, Zhang XL, Li JP, Zhou J, Su ZZ. Histopathological diagnosis of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: Is it reliable? World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(5): 98928
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i5/98928.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.98928