Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2025; 31(4): 101288
Published online Jan 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i4.101288
Table 1 Reports on gel immersion endoscopy for esophageal lesions
Ref.
Year
Article type
Gel/jelly type
Pathophysiology
Indication for gel immersion
Delivery procedure
Outcome
Obstacles for gel immersion
Nakano et al[27]2021Case reportOPF-203Esophageal cancerESD; discomfort and irritability due to CO2 insufflationDisposable forceps cap (manual irrigator)No CO2 insufflation was needed, and ESD was successfully completed/the bleeding speed slowed down-
Nakano et all[28]2022Case seriesOPF-203Esophageal cancerESD; 14 patients who underwent ESD for middle and lower thoracic superficial esophageal cancerDisposable forceps cap (manual irrigator)Completed ESD with en bloc and R0 resections achieved in 100%; No delayed adverse events
Ishikawa et al[29]2024Case reportOPF-203Esophageal cancerESD; significant fibrosis-Successfully completed ESD combined with underwater method and applying gel immersion-
Iwatsubo et al[31]2023Case reportOPF-203Esophageal cancerESD; difficult to secure visibilityERCP catheter (as an additional irrigation tube)Achieved curative resection-
Kato et al[32]2021Retrospective analysisLubricating jellyEsophageal varicesEsophageal varices imaging quality/esophageal varices detection14-Fr catheterImaging quality was superior than water-filled method. Using jelly resulted in clearer depiction of perforated varices
Sekiguchi et al[33]2022Case reportOPF-203Esophageal varicesRupture of esophageal varicesForceps channelEasily identified bleeding pointDecrease in suction pressure due to the gel viscosity
Hasebe et al[34]2022Case reportOPF-203Esophageal varicesRupture of esophageal varicesForceps channelEasily identified bleeding pointSubsequent EVL failed- EIS was succeeded
Sugawara et al[35]2023Case reportOPF-203Esophageal varicesEIS; non-rupture esophageal varicesForceps channelAccurately evaluate varices needs to EIS