Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2025; 31(3): 100393
Published online Jan 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.100393
Published online Jan 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.100393
Ref. | Method | Findings | Conclusion |
Acute conditions | |||
Cetinkaya et al[43], 2014 | Totally 102 patients with AP were recruited | RPR with a cutoff value of 0.000067 presented an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.783 (95%CI: 0.688-0.878) and predicted the mortality of approximately 80% of the patients | RPR is a valuable biomarker of mortality in AP |
Pusuroglu et al[44], 2015 | Totally 470 consecutive patients with STEMI submitted for primary PCI were prospectively enrolled | At LRA, high RPR was an independent predictor of one-year cardiovascular mortality (P = 0.003, OR = 3.106, 95%CI: 1.456-6.623) | RPR is an inexpensive and readily available biomarker which offers additional risk stratification in predicting long-term MACE and cardiovascular mortality in STEMI |
Celık et al[42], 2015 | Totally 580 STEMI patients were divided into two groups according to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grades after primary PCI | At LRA, RPR was among the independent predictors of no-reflow after primary PCI. In its turn, being in the no-reflow group compared to the reflow patients was associated with higher odds of in-hospital MACE, and cardiovascular mortality | RPR is among the independent predictors of no-reflow and in-hospital MACE among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI |
Karabulut and Arcagok[45], 2020 | RPR was compared to C-reactive protein and procalcitonin to investigate the potential to predict EOS in newborns | RPR and other biomarkers had higher values in proven EOS than in the controls | RPR may be used in the diagnosis of EOS among newborns as a good alternative to other tools |
Lehmann et al[46], 2021 | Totally 102 subjects with deep-seated ICH were included | At LRA elevated RPR ≥ 0.06 was among the independent predictors of 90-day mortality | RPR, as a biomarker of inflammation, might serve for prognostic assessment in deep-seated ICH |
Jiang et al[47], 2022 | Totally 47 individuals with MSA, 125 subjects with Parkinson’s disease, and 124 healthy controls were enrolled | At LRA, RPR was associated with the risk of MSA | Patients with MSA probably have peripheral inflammatory reaction |
Liu et al[48], 2022 | Totally 3367 patients with sepsis were enrolled | After adjustment for confounders, high RPR was significantly associated with increased mortality both for categorical and continuous variables (adjusted HR = 1.210, 95%CI: 1.045–1.400; and adjusted HR = 2.826, 95%CI: 2.025–3.944, respectively) | Elevated RPR values predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis |
Wang et al[49], 2022 | Totally 45 newborns were included in each of three groups of different severity; mild, moderate, and severe conditions based on SNAPE-II | A positive correlation was found between the SNAPE-II scores and RPR among newborns in NICU | Further to the SNAPE-II, also RPR can be used as a supplementary predictor biomarker for the assessment of neonatal morbidity and mortality in NICU |
Liang et al[50], 2023 | Retrospective cohort study of 2823 adults with ICH | After adjustment for confounding factors, the 3rd tertile of RPR values, compared to the 1st tertile, was associated with increased odds of 30-day death in patients with ICH (HR = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.15–1.64) | Among subjects with ICH, elevated RPR levels predict 30-day mortality |
Kasirer et al[51], 2024 | Totally 69 infants with NEC and 78 controls were enrolled | RPR was significantly associated with both NEC diagnosis (P < 0.0001) and mortality (P = 0.01). However, at LRA only variations of platelet count from birth to diagnosis remained significant | The often-elusive attempts to definitively diagnose NEC among preterm newborns may benefit from largely available, cheap, and easily calculated platelet indices |
Chronic and acute-on chronic conditions | |||
Özer Bekmez et al[52], 2018 | A cohort of 112 infants with medically treated hsPDA and 96 controls were recruited | At LRA analysis, high RPR (OR = 3.3, 95%CI: 1.438-5.872, P < 0.05) was one of the independent risk factors for hsPDA | RPR is a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of hsPDA |
Bilgin et al[53], 2019 | Totally 312 CRC patients were enrolled | Among subjects with right-sided advanced cancer, OS was statistically significantly better for those with RPR ≥ 0.05 compared to those with RPR < 0.05 (median OS; RPR ≥ 0.05: 24.8 months vs < 0.05: 13.9 months; P = 0.035) | After validation, RPR can be used as a prognostic marker in CRC |
Dagistan and Cosgun[54], 2019 | Retrospective survey of 1342 subjects submitted to cranial MRI | A statistically significant difference was found in RPR values among the various study groups (Fazekas 0 to Fazekas 3) (P < 0.001) | Increased RPR values may suggest higher Fazekas's score and dementia in cranial MRI studies |
Guler Kazanci et al[55], 2019 | Totally 481 infants were recruited (169 with hsPDA and 312 controls) | RPR was significantly higher in the hsPDA group (P < 0.05). At LRA RPR > 0.070 (risk ratio = 5.33; 95%CI: 3.28-8.65; P < 0.001) was among the independent predictors of hsPDA | High RPR values in the first hours of life are a risk factor for hsPDA (and hsPDA refractive to ibuprofen treatment) in preterm infants |
Chen et al[56], 2023 | Totally 1922 AECOPD adults participating in the MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV; and 1738 AECOPD patients from Emergency Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database were recruited | After adjusting for confounders, Log (RPR×1000) was associated with elevated risk of in-hospital mortality of AECOPD patients (OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.01–1.84) | Among AECOPD patients RPR was associated with in-hospital mortality |
- Citation: Zheng MH, Lonardo A. Red cell distribution width/platelet ratio predicts decompensation of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease-related compensated advanced chronic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(3): 100393
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i3/100393.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i3.100393