Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2025; 31(1): 96199
Published online Jan 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i1.96199
Published online Jan 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i1.96199
Figure 7 Beta diversity analysis.
A: Α diversity analysis of fecal flora between the control group and the tail-hanging group; B: Α diversity analysis of fecal flora between the tail-hanging group and the probiotic tail-hanging group; C: Α diversity analysis of mucosal flora between the tail-hanging group and the probiotic tail-hanging group; D: Α diversity analysis of mucosal flora between the control group and the tail-hanging group; E: Α diversity analysis of fecal and mucosal flora in the control group; F: Α diversity analysis of fecal and mucosal flora in the tail-hanging group; G: Α diversity analysis of fecal and mucosal flora in the probiotic tail-hanging group. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01; LM: Luminal microbiata stands for rat fecal stool flora; MAM: Mucosa-associated microbiota stands for colon mucosal flora; A, B, and C stand for the control group, the tail-hanging group, and the probiotic tail-hanging group, respectively.
- Citation: Zhang P, Zhu Y, Chen P, Zhou T, Han ZY, Xiao J, Ma JF, Ma W, Zang P, Chen Y. Effects of Bifidobacterium lactis BLa80 on fecal and mucosal flora and stem cell factor/c-kit signaling pathway in simulated microgravity rats. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(1): 96199
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i1/96199.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i1.96199