Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2024; 30(9): 1096-1107
Published online Mar 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1096
Published online Mar 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1096
Ref. | Country | n | GERD on pH analysis | Symptoms | Erosive esophagitis | PPI use |
Kumbhari et al[6], 2017 | Multicenter | 282 | 57.8% | 39.9% | Overall: 23.2% | 38.6% |
Modayil et al[12], 2021 | United States | 610 | 57.1% | 20.5% (> 1/week) | Overall: 49.8% | 74.7% |
Nabi et al[11], 2020 | India | 209 | 47.9% | 29.3% | Overall: 41.9% | NR |
Shiwaku et al[7], 2022 | Japan, Multicenter | 2905 | NR | 15.9% (GERD Q > 7) | Overall: 64.9%. Severe (LA C and D): 7.5% | 33.2% |
Abu-Nuwar et al[17], 2022 | United States | 183 | Objective GERD (pH/endoscopy): 50.5% | 38.8% | - | NR |
Simkova et al[67], 2023 | Czech Republic | 522 | 47.1% | 32.6% | 41.4%. Severe (LA C and D): 4.6% | 52.1% |
- Citation: Nabi Z, Inavolu P, Duvvuru NR. Prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: An update. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(9): 1096-1107
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i9/1096.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1096