Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2024; 30(48): 5162-5173
Published online Dec 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i48.5162
Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes
Outcome
PAR1 alone (n = 11)
EAR2 alone (n = 68)
Both pH (+) (n = 18)
Both pH (-) (n = 93)
P value (4-group comparison)
Week 4
Symptom improvement, median (IQR)40 (5, 70)330 (0, 60)430 (0, 40)50 (0, 30)0.001
≥ 50% improvement, n (%)5 (45)28 (41)44 (22)19 (20)0.02
Change of the GERDyzer total score, median (IQR)-11 (-21, -3)-14 (-26, -1)4-9 (-19, -4)-5 (-12, 0)0.02
Week 8
Symptom improvement, median (IQR)70 (20, 80)350 (30, 80)435 (0, 60)20 (0, 50)0.0007
≥ 50% improvement, n (%)8 (73)340 (59)47 (39)31 (33)0.003
Change of the GERDyzer total score, median (IQR)-23 (-39, -13)3-18 (-28, -1)4-18 (-23, -10)-8 (-16, 0)0.006
Week 12
Symptom improvement, median (IQR)85 (20, 99)360 (10, 85)450 (0, 90)30 (0, 60)0.002
≥ 50% improvement, n (%)8 (73)340 (59)410 (56)31 (33)0.003
Change of the GERDyzer total score, median (IQR)-26 (-28, -19)3-20 (-30, -3)4-16 (-26, -8)-9 (-18, -1)0.01