Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2024; 30(4): 308-317
Published online Jan 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i4.308
Published online Jan 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i4.308
Table 1 Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging factors for prediction of hepatic lymph nodes metastases
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
Non-hepatic LNM (n = 57) | hepatic LNM HLN (n = 40) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | ||
Gender | Male/female | 44/13 | 27/13 | 0.029a | ||
Age | 52.91 ± 10.48 | 57.53 ± 9.43 | 0.054 | |||
BMI | 24.63 ± 3.04 | 24.50 ± 3.04 | 0.842 | |||
Primary location | Right/left-side | 15/42 | 6/34 | 0.944 | ||
Differentiation | Low to moderate/High | 55/2 | 40/0 | 0.510 | ||
T stage of primary tumor | T1+2/T3+4 | 3/54 | 4/36 | 0.650 | ||
N stage of primary tumor | N0/N+ | 9/48 | 5/35 | 0.149 | ||
Gene | RAS-wild/mutation | 38/19 | 28/12 | 0.729 | ||
Simultaneous liver metastases | No/Yes | 13/44 | 12/28 | 0.425 | ||
Distribution | Solitary/Bilateral | 20/37 | 15/25 | 0.808 | ||
Number of CRLM | ≤ 3/> 3 | 17/40 | 15/25 | 0.429 | ||
Size (mm) | 38.25 ± 27.69 | 37.88 ± 22.11 | 0.944 | |||
RECIST | Response/Non-response | 33/24 | 21/19 | 0.599 | ||
Disappearing lesion | No/Yes | 46/11 | 34/6 | 0.584 | ||
pre-CEA | ≤ 5/> 5 ng/mL | 15/42 | 11/29 | 0.897 | ||
pre-CA199 | ≤ 40/> 40 U/mL | 26/31 | 17/23 | 0.761 | ||
post-CEA | ≤ 5/> 5 ng/mL | 27/30 | 17/23 | 0.635 | ||
post-CA199 | ≤ 40/> 40 U/mL | 33/24 | 25/15 | 0.649 | ||
Short axis of largest lymph node before treatment | mm | 7.39 ± 2.65 | 11.88 ± 5.35 | < 0.001a | ||
Long axis of largest lymph node before treatment | mm | 14.25 ± 6.41 | 18.28 ± 7.28 | 0.005a | ||
Pre-ADC | mm2/s | 1.54 ± 0.35 | 1.49 ± 0.30 | 0.394 | ||
Pre-D | mm2/s | 1.21 ± 0.43 | 1.02 ± 0.25 | 0.005a | ||
Pre-D* | mm2/s | 3.33 ± 2.37 | 2.70 ± 2.38 | 0.200 | ||
Pre-f | 0.49 ± 0.17 | 0.45 ± 0.14 | 0.330 | |||
Pre-DDC | mm2/s | 3.21 ± 1.69 | 2.01 ± 0.83 | < 0.001a | < 0.001 | 0.002a |
Pre-α | 0.59 ± 0.17 | 0.62 ± 0.16 | 0.363 | |||
Short axis of largest lymph node after treatment | mm | 6.74 ± 2.13 | 10.43 ± 3.62 | < 0.001a | 1.509 (1.235-1.845) | < 0.001a |
Long axis of largest lymph node after treatment | mm | 13.46 ± 5.78 | 17.08 ± 6.82 | 0.006a | ||
Post-ADC | mm2/s | 1.64 ± 0.32 | 1.45 ± 0.32 | 0.006a | ||
Post-D | mm2/s | 1.35 ± 0.86 | 1.24 ± 0.78 | 0.529 | ||
Post-D* | mm2/s | 3.69 ± 2.96 | 3.48 ± 3.38 | 0.751 | ||
Post-f | 0.51 ± 0.18 | 0.52 ± 0.18 | 0.732 | |||
Post-DDC | 3.46 ± 1.48 | 2.37 ± 0.91 | < 0.001a | |||
Post-α | 0.61 ± 0.13 | 0.67 ± 0.13 | 0.035a |
- Citation: Zhu HB, Zhao B, Li XT, Zhang XY, Yao Q, Sun YS. Value of multiple models of diffusion-weighted imaging to predict hepatic lymph node metastases in colorectal liver metastases patients. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(4): 308-317
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i4/308.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i4.308