Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2024; 30(23): 3005-3015
Published online Jun 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i23.3005
Published online Jun 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i23.3005
Table 4 Diagnostic accuracy of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and multi-detector computed tomography for gastric cancer T staging based on clinicopathological features, n (%)
Features | Total | Accuracy of DCEUS (%) | Accuracy of MDCT (%) | P value |
Location | ||||
Upper | 17 | 14 (82.4) | 9 (52.9) | 0.067 |
Middle | 70 | 58 (82.9) | 40 (57.1) | 0.001 |
Lower | 122 | 110 (90.2) | 80 (65.6) | < 0.001 |
Entire | 20 | 17 (85.0) | 11 (55.0) | 0.038 |
Tumor size | ||||
< 2.0 cm | 78 | 67 (85.9) | 48 (61.5) | < 0.001 |
≥ 2.0 cm | 151 | 139 (92.1) | 97 (64.2) | < 0.001 |
Ulceration | ||||
Yes | 198 | 168 (84.8) | 117 (59.1) | < 0.001 |
No | 31 | 31 (100) | 23 (74.2) | 0.0051 |
Borrmann classification | ||||
I | 7 | 7 (100) | 5 (71.4) | 0.4621 |
II | 56 | 46 (82.1) | 27 (48.2) | < 0.001 |
III | 70 | 58 (82.9) | 43 (61.4) | < 0.001 |
IV | 16 | 14 (87.5) | 9 (56.3) | 0.1131 |
Histopathological type | ||||
Well differentiation | 11 | 11 (100) | 10 (90.9) | 0.3061 |
Moderately differentiation | 45 | 39 (86.7) | 20 (44.4) | < 0.001 |
Poorly differentiation | 173 | 149 (86.1) | 110 (63.6) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Xu YF, Ma HY, Huang GL, Zhang YT, Wang XY, Wei MJ, Pei XQ. Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy of T staging compared with multi-detector computed tomography in gastric cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(23): 3005-3015
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i23/3005.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i23.3005