Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy of T staging compared with multi-detector computed tomography in gastric cancer patients

doi:10.3748/wjg.v30.i23.3005

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 30, Issue 23

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (365)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

122

Figures (1-6)

Tables (1-4)

Sum=185

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=118

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=48

Jun 21, 2024 (publication date) through Jun 30, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Prospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2024; 30(23): 3005-3015
Published online Jun 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i23.3005

Table 2 Clinicopathological features of patients, n (%)

Features	Total
Sex
Male	137 (59.8)
Female	92 (40.2)
Age (yr; mean ± SD)	54.9 ± 13.0
Pathological T staging
T1a	47 (20.5)
T1b	33 (14.4)
T2	33 (14.4)
T3	59 (25.8)
T4a	53 (23.1)
T4b	4 (1.8)
Location
Upper	17 (7.4)
Middle	70 (30.6)
Lower	122 (53.3)
Entire	20 (8.7)
Histopathological type
Well differentiation	11 (4.8)
Moderately differentiation	45 (19.7)
Poorly differentiation	173 (75.5)
Bormann classification
I	7 (4.7)
II	56 (37.6)
III	70 (47.0)
IV	16 (10.7)
Ulceration
Yes	198 (86.5)
No	31 (13.5)
Tumor size (cm, mean ± SD)	3.5 ± 2.4

Citation: Xu YF, Ma HY, Huang GL, Zhang YT, Wang XY, Wei MJ, Pei XQ. Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy of T staging compared with multi-detector computed tomography in gastric cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(23): 3005-3015
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i23/3005.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i23.3005