Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2024; 30(21): 2763-2776
Published online Jun 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i21.2763
Published online Jun 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i21.2763
Figure 3 Efficacy comparison of nomogram and existing criteria.
A: The 3-year area under the curve (AUC) of nomogram and Milan, Hangzhou and UCSF for overall survival (OS); B: The 5-year AUC of nomogram and Milan, Hangzhou and UCSF for OS; C: The 3-year AUC of nomogram and Milan, Hangzhou, UCSF for recurrence free survival (RFS); D: The 5-year AUC of nomogram and Milan, Hangzhou, UCSF for RFS; E: The calibration curve of nomogram for OS; F: The calibration curve of nomogram for RFS. OS: Overall survival; RFS: Recurrence free survival.
- Citation: He L, Ji WS, Jin HL, Lu WJ, Zhang YY, Wang HG, Liu YY, Qiu S, Xu M, Lei ZP, Zheng Q, Yang XL, Zhang Q. Development of a nomogram for predicting liver transplantation prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(21): 2763-2776
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i21/2763.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i21.2763