Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2024; 30(15): 2068-2080
Published online Apr 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i15.2068
Table 1 Results of clinical trials with dual biologic therapy in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease
Ref.No. of patients/diseaseKind of DBTEfficacySide-effects
Sands et al[14], 200779 (two arms: 52 and 27 respectively) CDIFX + Natali-zumab vs IFX + placeboBetter results in DBT but not significantHeadache, infections (27%), nausea, nasopharyngitis
Privitera et al[11], 202016 (11 with CD & 5 with UC)anti-TNF + VDZ or UST or VDZ & UST for 8 wkClinical improvement (intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations): In all patientsIn 3 patients, all non-serious
Glassner et al[12], 202050 IBD patients (32 CD, 18 UC)29 out of 50 patients received DBTDBT: More patients in clinical and endoscopic remission at follow-up vs baselineIn 26% of pts. Infections: In patients on DBT. Lower risk in those not on a concomitant immunomodulator
Yang et al[15], 202022 patients with CD with 24 therapeutic trials of DBTSix biologic agents were used in: Anti-TNF + UST or VDZEndoscopic improvement: In 43% of trials. Endoscopic remission: 26%. Clinical response: 50%. Clinical remission: 41%Similar rates of adverse events (13% of trials)
Kwapisz et al[13], 202115 (14 CD, 1 UC)Various biologics VDZ + anti-TNF/UST; UST + anti-TNF/VDZDBT may be effective. Anti-TNF or VDZ plus UST were most effectiveDBT may be safe
Feagan et al[19], 2023Severe UCGUS + GOL (71) vs GUS alone (72) vs GOL alone (71 pts)At week 12, 83% of DBT patients had clinical response vs 61% and 75% on GOL and GUS monotherapy, respectivelyAt week 50, 63%, 76% and 65% of patients experienced at least one side-effect (infections, fever, nasopharyngitis, neutropenia
Miyatani et al[18], 2024CDUPA + UST5/6 patients, achi-evedremission. Two with severe arthritis: Signifi-cant improvementMild respiratory symptoms and nausea