Endoscopic transgastric fenestration versus percutaneous drainage for management of (peri)pancreatic fluid collections adjacent to gastric wall (with video)

Table 2 Endoscopic transgastric fenestration vs percutaneous drainage for management of (peri) pancreatics, n (%)

	ETGF	PCD	P value
Technical success	34 (100)	38 (100)
Clinical success	33/34 (97.1)	29/38 (76.3)	0.01
Recurrence	1/34 (2.94)	4/38 (10.5)	0.42
Reintervention	10/34 (29.4)	171/38 (44.7)	0.18
Complication			1.00
	Bleeding 4 (11.76)	Bleeding 2 (5.26)
		Local infection 2 (5.26)
		Adhesion to surrounding tissue 1 (2.63)
Catheter related adverse events			0.001
	Tube dislodgment 1 (2.9)	Intubation time > 8 wk 11 (28.9)
		Drainage obstruction 5 (13.2)

¹There were 8 patients who received a twice percutaneous drainage (PCD) and another 3 required no less than three times of PCD, 2 transferred to endoscopic transgastric fenestration and 7 to surgery after PCD failure. ETGF: Endoscopic transgastric fenestration; PCD: Percutaneous drainage.