Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2023; 29(37): 5327-5338
Published online Oct 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i37.5327
Table 2 Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation summary of findings table
Outcomes
Anticipated absolute effects1 (95%CI)
Relative effect (95%CI)
Number of participants (studies)
Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)
Risk with placebo
Risk with semaglutide
Resolution of NASH with no worsening of liver fibrosis assessed with: Liver biopsy183 per 1000416 per 1000 (276 to 571)OR 3.18 (1.70 to 5.95)301 (2 RCTs)+++O: Moderate2
Improvement in liver fibrosis stage without worsening of NASH assessed with: Liver biopsy317 per 1000248 per 1000 (65 to 613)OR 0.71 (0.15 to 3.41)301 (2 RCTs)++OO: Low2,3,4
Liver stiffness assessed with: MRI-PDFF or Fibroscan-SMD 0.48 lower (0.86 lower to 0.11 lower)-350 (3 RCTs)++++: High
Liver steatosis assessed with: MREThe mean liver steatosis ranged from -0.57% to -2.57%MD 4.96 % lower (9.92 lower to 0.01 higher)-138 (2 RCTs)+++O: Moderate3
ALTThe mean ALT ranged from 1.90 U/L to -11.22 U/LMD 14.06 U/L lower (22.06 lower to 6.07 lower)-458 (3 RCTs)++++: High
ASTThe mean AST ranged from 1.50 U/K to -5.76 U/KMD 11.44 U/K lower (17.23 lower to 5.65 lower)-458 (3 RCTs)++++: High
Serious adverse events109 per 1000147 per 1000 (84 to 244)OR 1.40 (0.75 to 2.62)456 (3 RCTs)+++O: Moderate2,4