Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2023; 29(37): 5268-5291
Published online Oct 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i37.5268
Published online Oct 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i37.5268
Table 1 Comparison of existing clinical scoring systems used in patients with acute pancreatitis for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis, such as severe acute pancreatitis, mortality, organ failure, intensive care unit admission, location complications, in-hospital adverse events, and pancreatic necrosis
Prediction | Scoring system (cutoff value) | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | Accuracy, % | PPV, % | NPV, % | AUC | No. of patients | Ref. |
MSAP and SAP1 | BISAP (≥ 3) | 54 | 86 | - | 68 | - | 0.795 | 326 | [107] |
Ranson (≥ 3) | 46 | 84 | - | 54 | - | 0.766 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 57 | 89 | - | 67 | - | 0.814 | |||
MCTSI (≥ 4) | 36 | 94 | - | 66 | - | 0.654 | |||
SAP1 | Ranson (≥ 3) | 85.7 | 44.3 | - | 18.8 | 95.3 | 0.69 | 161 | [106] |
BISAP (≥ 2) | 61.9 | 72.1 | - | 25.0 | 92.7 | 0.74 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 81.0 | 65.7 | - | 26.2 | 95.8 | 0.78 | |||
CTSI (≥ 3) | 66.7 | 67.1 | - | 23.3 | 93.1 | 0.69 | |||
SAP1,2 | Ranson (≥ 4/≥ 3) | 81.4/92.0 | 84.2/92.8 | - | 28.9/37.7 | 98.3/99.6 | 0.867/0.964 | 368/550 | [110] |
BISAP (≥ 3/≥ 2) | 88.9/96.0 | 86.5/88.0 | - | 34.3/27.6 | 99.0/99.8 | 0.922/0.942 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 9/≥ 8) | 85.2/96.0 | 61.0/93.0 | - | 14.7/42.9 | 98.1/99.8 | 0.784/0.951 | |||
Glasgow (≥ 3/≥ 2) | 85.2/80.0 | 84.2/88.2 | - | 29.9/24.4 | 98.6/98.9 | 0.913/0.881 | |||
SAP | HAPS (≥ 1) | 79.0 | 49.7 | 53.3 | 18.2 | 94.4 | 0.687 | 653 | [111] |
BISAP (≥ 3) | 24.7 | 95.3 | 86.5 | 42.6 | 89.9 | - | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 80.2 | 63.3 | 65.4 | 23.6 | 95.8 | - | |||
Ranson (≥ 3) | 92.6 | 51.9 | 57.0 | 21.4 | 98.0 | 0.857 | |||
Glasgow (≥ 3) | 76.5 | 68.5 | 69.5 | 25.6 | 95.4 | - | |||
SOFA (≥ 7) | 13.6 | 99.7 | 89.0 | 84.6 | 89.1 | 0.966 | |||
SAP3 | APACHE II (≥ 6) | 50 | 100 | 68.3 | 100 | 53.57 | 0.771 | 164 | [112] |
BISAP (≥ 2) | 25.96 | 100 | 53.1 | 100 | 43.80 | 0.640 | |||
Modified Glasgow ≥ 3) | 75.96 | 100 | 84.8 | 100 | 70.59 | 0.649 | |||
Ranson (≥ 2) | 32.69/58.65 | 100/100 | 57.3/73.8 | 100/100 | 46.15/58.25 | 0.848/0.817 | |||
SAP3,4 | APACHE II (≥ 6) | 63.7 | 77.1 | 68.2 | 84.6 | 51.9 | - | 69 | [112] |
BISAP (≥ 2) | 31.8 | 85.7 | 50.0 | 81.4 | 38.9 | - | |||
Modified Glasgow (≥ 3) | 79.9 | 31.4 | 63.4 | 69.6 | 44.0 | - | |||
Ranson (≥ 2) | 44.9/63.7 | 91.4/51.4 | 60.5/59.6 | 91.1/72.1 | 45.7/41.8 | - | |||
Mortality1 | BISAP (≥ 3) | 89 | 80 | - | 15 | - | 0.867 | 326 | [107] |
Ranson (≥ 3) | 78 | 77 | - | 9 | - | 0.842 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 89 | 78 | - | 10 | - | 0.854 | |||
MCTSI (≥ 4) | 78 | 86 | - | 14 | - | 0.839 | |||
Mortality in AP | HAPS (≥ 1) | 83.3 | 46.6 | 29.9 | 2.8 | 99.3 | - | 653 | [111] |
BISAP (≥ 3) | 25 | 93.1 | 91.9 | 6.4 | 98.5 | - | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 100 | 58.7 | 59.1 | 3.6 | 100 | - | |||
Ranson (≥ 3) | 100 | 47.3 | 48.2 | 3.4 | 100 | 0.917 | |||
Glasgow ≥ 3) | 75.0 | 63.8 | 64.2 | 4.1 | 99.5 | - | |||
SOFA (≥ 7) | 50.0 | 98.9 | 98.0 | 46.2 | 99.1 | 0.968 | |||
Mortality1 | BISAP (≥ 2.5) | 92.0 | 90.0 | - | - | - | 0.92 | 106 | [113] |
HAPS (≥ 1.5) | 49.0 | 98.0 | - | - | - | 0.83 | |||
Ranson (≥ 3.5) | 75.0 | 71.0 | - | - | - | 0.78 | |||
JSS (≥ 3.5) | 84.0 | 94.0 | - | - | - | 0.92 | |||
Glasgow (≥ 2.5) | 89.0 | 86.0 | - | - | - | 0.91 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 5.5) | 90.0 | 92.0 | - | - | - | 0.94 | |||
Persistent organ failure1,5 | APACHE II (≥ 7) | 84/94 | 71/44 | - | 49/14 | 93/99 | 0.77/0.71 | 256/397 | [105] |
BISAP (≥ 2) | 61/62 | 84/76 | - | 54/20 | 87/96 | 0.72/0.69 | |||
Glasgow (≥ 2) | 85/65 | 83/82 | - | 61/22 | 95/97 | 0.84/0.74 | |||
HAPS (≥ 1) | 70/73 | 53/58 | - | 32/12 | 85/97 | 0.62/0.66 | |||
JSS (≥ 2) | 59/42 | 92/89 | - | 70/23 | 88/95 | 0.76/0.66 | |||
Ranson (≥ 2) | 66/46 | 78/80 | - | 49/16 | 88/95 | 0.72/0.63 | |||
SIRS (≥ 2) | 70/69 | 71/58 | - | 43/11 | 88/96 | 0.70/0.64 | |||
Organ failure1 | Ranson (≥ 3) | 88.89 | 96.67 | - | 88.89 | 96.67 | 0.757 | 50 | [108] |
BISAP (≥ 3) | 90.00 | 83.87 | - | 64.29 | 96.30 | 0.762 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 92.86 | 69.44 | - | 54.17 | 96.15 | 0.831 | |||
MCTSI (> 4) | 92.86 | 75.00 | - | 59.09 | 96.43 | 0.893 | |||
Association with organ failure3 | APACHE II (≥ 6) | 48.5 | 36.2 | 40.3 | 27.8 | 28.1 | 164 | [112] | |
BISAP (≥ 2) | 8.5 | 55 | 39.4 | 8.8 | 54.2 | 0.640 | |||
Modified Glasgow (≥ 3) | 68.5 | 20.2 | 36.5 | 30.3 | 56 | 0.649 | |||
Ranson (≥ 2) | 14.2/22.8 | 68.1/36.2 | 50/31.7 | 18.5/15.3 | 61/48 | 0.848/0.817 | |||
ICU admission1 | Ranson (≥ 3) | 80.00 | 96.55 | - | 88.89 | 93.33 | 0.910 | 50 | [108] |
BISAP (≥ 3) | 90.91 | 86.67 | - | 71.43 | 96.30 | 0.877 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 92.31 | 65.71 | - | 50.00 | 95.83 | 0.885 | |||
MCTSI (> 4) | 92.86 | 75.00 | - | 59.09 | 96.43 | 0.993 | |||
ICU admission | HAPS ≥ 1 | 90.0 | 47.2 | 29.9 | 5.1 | 99.3 | - | 653 | [111] |
BISAP ≥ 3 | 25.0 | 93.4 | 91.3 | 10.6 | 97.5 | - | |||
APACHE II ≥ 8 | 100 | 59.6 | 60.5 | 6.6 | 100 | - | |||
Ranson ≥ 3 | 100 | 47.9 | 49.5 | 5.7 | 100 | 0.946 | |||
Glasgow ≥ 3 | 75.0 | 64.5 | 65.1 | 7.0 | 99.3 | - | |||
SOFA ≥ 7 | 40.0 | 99.2 | 97.4 | 61.5 | 98.1 | 0.943 | |||
Location complications1 | BISAP (≥ 3) | 54 | 81 | - | 21 | - | 0.731 | 326 | [107] |
Ranson (≥ 3) | 57 | 79 | - | 20 | - | 0.698 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 43 | 78 | - | 15 | - | 0.580 | |||
MCTSI (≥ 4) | 68 | 90 | - | 38 | - | 0.791 | |||
In-hospital adverse events1,6 | HAPS ≥ 2 | 66.2 | 70.6 | 36.0 | 89.1 | 0.70 | 690 | [109] | |
Ranson ≥ 3 | 66.9 | 62.8 | - | 31.2 | 88.3 | 0.68 | |||
BISAP ≥ 2 | 61.9 | 75.9 | - | 39.3 | 88.7 | 0.74 | |||
Glasgow ≥ 2 | 51.8 | 83.7 | - | 44.0 | 87.3 | 0.71 | |||
JSS7 | 81.9 | 66.0 | - | 38.2 | 93.4 | 0.80 | |||
Pancreatic necrosis1 | Ranson (≥ 3) | 80.00 | 96.55 | - | 88.89 | 93.33 | 0.910 | 50 | [108] |
BISAP (≥ 3) | 81.82 | 83.33 | - | 64.29 | 92.59 | 0.822 | |||
APACHE II (≥ 8) | 93.33 | 71.43 | - | 58.33 | 96.15 | 0.855 | |||
MCTSI (> 4) | 93.33 | 77.14 | - | 63.64 | 96.43 | 0.993 |
- Citation: Hu JX, Zhao CF, Wang SL, Tu XY, Huang WB, Chen JN, Xie Y, Chen CR. Acute pancreatitis: A review of diagnosis, severity prediction and prognosis assessment from imaging technology, scoring system and artificial intelligence. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(37): 5268-5291
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i37/5268.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i37.5268