Machine learning-based decision tool for selecting patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis for endosonography to exclude a biliary aetiology

doi:10.3748/wjg.v29.i35.5138

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 29, Issue 35

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (4973)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

110

WORD

HTML

2917

Figures (1-3)

346

Tables (1-3)

233

Sum=3638

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

210

Download

402

Sum=612

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

182

Download

372

Sum=554

Sep 21, 2023 (publication date) through Nov 28, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2023; 29(35): 5138-5153
Published online Sep 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i35.5138

Table 3 Variable distribution in the validation cohort (UMG + Technical University Munich)

Variable	Microlithiasis (n = 36)	Other (n = 81)	Total (n = 117)	P value
Age (yr)				0.162
mean ± SD	60.1 ± 18.4	55.3 ± 16.8	56.8 ± 17.4
Range	23-93	21-87	21-93
Sex				0.315
Female	12/36 (33.3%)	35/81 (43.2%)	47/117 (40.2%)
Male	24/36 (66.7%)	46/81 (56.8%)	70/117 (59.8%)
Alkaline phosphatase				0.032
N-Miss	1/36 (2.7%)	12/81 (14.8%)	13/117 (11.1%)
ULN	23/36 (63.8%)	30/81 (37%)	53/117 (45.2%)
WL	12/36 (33.2%)	39/81 (48.1%)	51/117 (43.5%)
Total bilirubin				0.003
ULN	21/36 (58.3%)	24/81 (29.6%)	45/117 (38.5%)
WL	15/36 (41.7%)	57/81 (70.4%)	72/117 (61.5%)
Creatine kinase				0.498
N-Miss	8/36 (22.2%)	32/81 (39.5%)	40/117 (34.1%)
ULN	5/36 (13.8%)	6/81 (7.4%)	11/117 (9.4%)
WL	23/36 (63.8%)	43/81 (53%)	66/117 (56.4%)
CRP				0.199
ULN	32/36 (88.9%)	64/81 (79%)	96/117 (88.8%)
WL	4/36 (11.1%)	17/81 (21%)	21/117 (17.9%)
Total protein				0.405
N-Miss	31/36 (86.1%)	73/81 (90.1%)	104/117 (88.8%)
WL	5/36 (13.8%)	8/81 (9.8%)	13/117 (11.1%)
Erythrocytes				0.650
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	1/81 (1.2%)	1/117 (0.8%)
LLN	10/36 (27.7%)	25/81 (30.8%)	35/117 (29.9%)
ULN	4/36 (11.1%)	5/81 (6.1%)	9/117 (7.6%)
WL	22/36 (61.1%)	50/81 (61.7%)	72/117 (61.5%)
Gamma-GT				0.082
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	2/81 (2.4%)	2/117 (1.7%)
ULN	32/36 (88.8%)	59/81 (72.8%)	91/117 (77.7%)
WL	4/36 (11.1%)	20/81 (24.6%)	24/117 (20.5%)
AST/GOT				0.079
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	4/81 (4.9%)	4/117 (3.4%)
ULN	28/36 (77.8%)	47/81 (58%)	75/117 (64.1%)
WL	8/36 (22.2%)	30/81 (37%)	38/117 (32.4%)
ALT/GPT				0.052
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	2/81 (2.4%)	2/117 (1.7%)
ULN	28/36 (77.8%)	43/81 (53%)	71/117 (60.6%)
WL	8/36 (22.2%)	30/81 (37%)	38/117 (32.4%)
Urea
N-Miss	7/36 (19.4%)	20/81 (24.6%)	27/117 (23%)
LLN	13/36 (36.1%)	41/81 (50.6%)	54/117 (46.1%)
ULN	0/36 (0%)	1/81 (1.2%)	1/117 (0.8%)
WL	16/36 (44.4%)	19/81 (23.4%)	35/117 (29.9%)
Hematocrit				< 0.001
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	1/81 (1.2%)	1/117 (0.8%)
ULN	36/36 (100%)	80/81 (98.7%)	116/117 (99.1%)
Haemoglobin				0.725
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	1/81 (1.2%)	1/117 (0.8%)
LLN	9/36 (25%)	18/81 (22.2%)	27/117 (23%)
ULN	3/36 (8.3%)	4/81 (4.9%)	7/117 (5.9%)
WL	32/36 (88.9%)	64/81 (79.0%)	96/117 (82%)
INR				0.440
ULN	2/36 (5.5%)	8/81 (9.8%)	10/117 (8.5%)
WL	34/36 (94.4%)	73/81 (90.1%)	107/117 (91.4%)
Potassium				0.985
LLN	2/36 (5.5%)	4/81 (4.9%)	6/117 (5.1%)
ULN	1/36 (2.7%)	2/81 (2.4%)	3/117 (2.5%)
WL	33/36 (91.6%)	75/81 (92.5%)	108/117 (92.3%)
Serum creatinine				0.909
LLN	2/36 (5.5%)	6/81 (7.4%)	8/117 (6.8%)
ULN	7/36 (19.4%)	14/81 (17.2%)	21/117 (17.9%)
WL	27/36 (75%)	61/81 (75.3%)	88/117 (75.2%)
LDH				0.018
N-Miss	6/36 (16.6%)	28/81 (34.5%)	34/117 (29%)
ULN	26/36 (72.2%)	33/81 (40.7%)	59/117 (50.4%)
WL	4/36 (11.1%)	20/81 (24.6%)	24/117 (20.5%)
Leukocytes				0.143
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	1/81 (1.2%)	1/117 (0.8%)
LLN	1/36 (2.7%)	0/81 (0%)	1/117 (0.8%)
ULN	16/36 (44.4%)	47/81 (58%)	63/117 (53.8%)
WL	19/36 (52.7%)	33/81 (40.7%)	52/117 (44.4%)
Lipase				0.237
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	2/81 (2.4%)	2/117 (1.7%)
ULN	32/36 (88.9%)	75/81 (92.5%)	107/117 (91.4%)
WL	4/36 (11.1%)	4/81 (4.9%)	8/117 (6.8%)
MCV				0.315
N-Miss	0/36 (0%)	1/81 (1.2%)	1/117 (0.8%)
LLN	3/36 (8.3%)	7/81 (8.6%)	10/117 (8.5%)
ULN	1/36 (2.7%)	9/81 (11.1%)	10/117 (8.5%)
WL	32/36 (88.9%)	64/81 (79%)	96/117 (82%)
Triglycerides				0.582
N-Miss	26/36 (72.2%)	43/81 (53%)	69/117 (58.9%)
ULN	3/36 (8.3%)	15/81 (18.5%)	18/117 (15.3%)
WL	7/36 (19.4%)	23/81 (28.3%)	30/117 (25.6%)
RDW
N-Miss	36/36 (100%)	81/81 (100%)	117/117 (100%)
False	0/36 (0%)	0/81 (0%)	0/117 (0%)
True	0/36 (0%)	0/81 (0%)	0/117 (0%)
Sodium				0.154
LLN	2/36 (5.5%)	12/81 (14.8%)	14/117 (11.9%)
WL	34/36 (94.4%)	69/81 (85.1%)	103/117 (88%)
Quick’s value				0.130
LLN	2/36 (5.5%)	6/81 (7.4%)	8/117 (6.8%)
ULN	13/36 (36.1%)	44/81 (54.3%)	57/117 (48.7%)
WL	21/36 (58.3%)	31/81 (38.2%)	52/117 (44.4%)
Thrombocytes				0.627
N-Miss	22/36 (61.1%)	51/81 (62.9%)	73/117 (62.3%)
LLN	2/36 (5.5%)	3/81 (3.7%)	5/117 (4.2%)
ULN	2/36 (5.5%)	2/81 (2.4%)	4/117 (3.4%)
WL	10/36 (27.7%)	25/81 (30.8%)	35/117 (29.9%)
TSH				0.773
N-Miss	6/36 (16.6%)	13/81 (16%)	19/117 (16.2%)
LLN	0/36 (0%)	1/81 (1.2%)	1/117 (0.8%)
ULN	1/36 (2.7%)	3/81 (3.7%)	4/117 (3.4%)
WL	29/36 (80.5%)	64/81 (79%)	93/117 (79.4%)

All variables that were used for the final predictive model are listed. For laboratory or urine values, the first available value during the inpatient stay was used. For the investigated groups of microlithiasis-induced acute pancreatitis (n = 36) vs the group of pancreatitis induced by other aetiologies (n = 81), the variables were categorised as whether collected or not (N-Miss), in the case of laboratory values whether below the lower limit value, within the limit values, or above the upper limit value. For the P value calculation using χ² test, variables with missing data shares of > 25% were not excluded. LLN: Lower limit value; WL: Within the limit value; ULN: Upper limit value; CRP: C-reactive protein; Gamma-GT: Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; GOT: Glutamic oxalacetic transaminases; ALT: Alanine transaminase; GPT: Glutamic pyruvic transaminase; INR: International normalized ratio; LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase; MCH: Mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC: Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; RDW: Red blood cell distribution width; MCV: Mean corpuscular volume; TSH: Thyrotropin.

Citation: Sirtl S, Żorniak M, Hohmann E, Beyer G, Dibos M, Wandel A, Phillip V, Ammer-Herrmenau C, Neesse A, Schulz C, Schirra J, Mayerle J, Mahajan UM. Machine learning-based decision tool for selecting patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis for endosonography to exclude a biliary aetiology. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(35): 5138-5153
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i35/5138.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i35.5138