Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2023; 29(29): 4593-4603
Published online Aug 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i29.4593
Published online Aug 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i29.4593
Table 6 Weight assignment to different types of incontinence by study group
| Solid | Liquid | Flatus | Mucous | Stress | Urge | |
| Patients’ (n = 50) average disability score | 82.5 ± 19.1 | 84.8 ± 15.4 | 58.1 ± 23.6 | 55.3 ± 21.2 | 52.0 ± 23.9 | 68.5 ± 23.5 |
| Laypersons’ (n = 50) average disability score | 83.0 ± 22.4 | 81.4 ± 19.2 | 54.6 ± 21.1 | 55.2 ± 19.3 | 48.8 ± 22.0 | 68.3 ± 22.8 |
| Total average disability score | 82.7 ± 20.7 | 83.1 ± 17.4 | 56.3 ± 22.3 | 55.2 ± 20.1 | 50.4 ± 22.9 | 68.4 ± 23.0 |
| Division by 10 | 8.27 | 8.31 | 5.63 | 5.52 | 5.04 | 6.84 |
| Final weight (after rounding-off) | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
- Citation: Garg P, Sudol-Szopinska I, Kolodziejczak M, Bhattacharya K, Kaur G. New objective scoring system to clinically assess fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(29): 4593-4603
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i29/4593.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i29.4593