Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2023; 29(23): 3668-3677
Published online Jun 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3668
Published online Jun 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3668
Table 2 Comparison of outcomes between the hot snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection groups
Original cohort | Propensity score-matched cohort | |||||
HSP | EMR | P value | HSP | EMR | P value | |
No. of lesions | 440 | 125 | 117 | 117 | ||
En bloc resection, n, % (95%CI) | 417, 94.8 (92.3-96.7) | 116, 92.8 (86.8-96.7) | 0.4 | 109, 93.2 (87.0-97.0) | 108, 92.3 (85.9-96.4) | 0.81 |
Piecemeal resection, n, % (95%CI) | 23, 5.2 (3.3-7.7) | 9, 7.2 (3.3-13.2) | 8, 6.8 (3.0-13.0) | 9, 7.7 (3.6-14.1) | ||
R0 resection, n, % (95%CI) | 359, 81.6 (77.6-85.1) | 101, 80.8 (72.8-87.3) | 0.84 | 91, 77.8 (69.2-84.9) | 94, 80.3 (72.0-87.1) | 0.64 |
RX/R1 resection, n, % (95%CI) | 81, 18.4 (14.9-22.4) | 24, 19.2 (12.7-27.2) | 26, 22.2 (15.1-30.8) | 23, 19.7 (12.9-28.0) | ||
Delayed bleeding, n, % (95%CI) | 5, 1.1 (0.4-2.6) | 2, 1.6 (0.2-5.7) | 0.68 | 2, 1.7 (0.2-6.0) | 2, 1.7 (0.2-6.0) | 1.00 |
Perforation, n, % (95%CI) | 0, 0 (0-0.8) | 1, 0.8 (0.0-4.4) | 0.06 | 0, 0 (0-3.1) | 1, 0.9 (0-4.7) | N/A |
- Citation: Minakata N, Murano T, Wakabayashi M, Sasabe M, Watanabe T, Mitsui T, Yamashita H, Inaba A, Sunakawa H, Nakajo K, Kadota T, Shinmura K, Ikematsu H, Yano T. Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(23): 3668-3677
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i23/3668.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3668