Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2023; 29(23): 3645-3657
Published online Jun 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3645
Table 1 Correlation between clinicopathological characteristic and NPAS2 in gastric cancer
Characteristic
Low expression of NPAS2
High expression of NPAS2
P value
Number3566
Age, n (%)0.599
< 6021 (60.0)36 (54.5)
≥ 6014 (40.0)30 (45.5)
Sex, n (%)0.626
Female7 (20.0)16 (24.2)
Male28 (80.0)51 (75.8)
TNM stage, n (%)0.001
I-II25 (71.4)11 (16.7)
III-IV10 (28.6)55 (83.3)
pT stage, n (%)0.351
T1-T26 (17.1)29 (82.9)
T3-T47 (10.6)59 (89.4)
pN stage, n (%)0.009
N016 (45.7)12 (18.2)
N1-N319 (54.3)54 (81.8)
Metastasis, n (%)0.032
M035 (100.0)58 (87.9)
M10 (0.0)8 (12.1)
Tumor size, n (%)0.626
< 515 (42.9)25 (37.9)
≥ 520 (57.1)41 (62.1)
Tumor location, n (%)0.611
Antrum14 (40.0)33 (50.0)
Body9 (25.7)13 (19.7)
Cardia12 (34.3)20 (30.3)
Venous invasion, n (%)0.012
Negative9 (25.7)5 (7.6)
Positive26 (74.3)61 (92.4)
Neural invasion, n (%)0.736
Negative15 (42.9)26 (39.4)
Positive20 (57.1)40 (60.6)
Lymphatic invasion, n (%)0.001
Negative22 (62.9)12 (18.2)
Positive13 (37.1)54 (81.8)
Positive lymph node, n (%)0.001
Negative22 (62.9)14 (21.2)
Positive13 (37.1)52 (78.8)
Differentiated degree, n (%)0.16
Poorly27 (77.1)58 (87.9)
Moderately and highly8 (22.9)8 (12.1)
Lauren’s Classification, n (%)0.569
Intestinal23 (65.7)47 (71.2)
Diffuse12 (34.3)19 (28.8)