Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2023; 29(23): 3574-3594
Published online Jun 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3574
Table 1 Summary of clinical trial results of monoclonal antibody-based therapies
Study
Target disease
No. of patients
Objective response rate
Complete response rate
Median progression-free survival
Overall survival
Adverse events or other subjects
Ref.
Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide phase-II L-MIDr/r DLBCL (no FL) > 35 mo follow upn = 8057.5% (n = 46/80)40.0% (n = 32/80)11.6 mo33.5 moNo unexpected toxicity[14]
Phase-II ROMULUS, rituximab-polatuzumab vs rituximab-pinatuzumabr/r FLn = 42, n = 20, n = 2170% (n = 14/20); 62% (n = 13/21)45% (n = 9/20); 5% (n = 1/21)UnknownUnknown[15]
Loncastuximab tesirine (ADTC-402) frontline therapyUntreated FLTotal, DLBCL, MZL, FL45.6%, 42.3%, 46.7%, 78.6%26.7%UnknownUnknownMedian duration response: 5.4 mo[16]
Magrolimab plus rituximab phase-Ibr/r DLBCL; r/r FLn = 22; DLBCL:15; FL: 750% (CR or PR); 40%, 71% (n = 5/7)33%, 43% (n = 3/7)UnknownUnknown90% response were on going, a median follow-up of 6.2 (DLBCL)/8.1 (FL) mo[17]
Venetoclax plus obinutumab phase-IUntreated FLCT, PET/CT 87.5%, 84.2%25.0%, 68.4%77.8% (at one yr); 79.0% (at one yr); 73.2% (at 30 mo); 79.0% (at 30 mo)Unknown; unknown[19]
GALLIUM trial obinutuzumab + CTx rituximab + CTxUntreated FLn = 1202, n = 601, n = 60188.5%, 86.9%Unknown, unknown80.0% (at 3 yr); 73.3% (at 3 yr)Unknown, unknownObinutuzumab is better[20,21]