Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2023; 29(22): 3548-3560
Published online Jun 14, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3548
Published online Jun 14, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3548
Figure 3 Receiver operating curve.
A-D: Receiver operating curve for sound speed estimation (A), attenuation coefficient (B), continuous controlled attenuation parameter (C) and hepato-renal index (D). PDFF: Proton density fat fraction; cCAP: Continuous controlled attenuation parameter; SSE: Sound speed estimation; AC: Attenuation coefficient; HRI: Hepato-renal index.
- Citation: Collin R, Magnin B, Gaillard C, Nicolas C, Abergel A, Buchard B. Prospective study comparing hepatic steatosis assessment by magnetic resonance imaging and four ultrasound methods in 105 successive patients. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(22): 3548-3560
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i22/3548.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3548