Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2023; 29(21): 3341-3361
Published online Jun 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i21.3341
Published online Jun 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i21.3341
Table 2 Summary of rescue strategies for lumen-apposing metal stent misdeployment
EUS-CDS | |
Deployment of a new stent through the created fistula tract | 44.1% |
Stent-in-stent strategy | 23.5% |
Endoscopic rendezvous | 11.8% |
Non-endoscopic rescue strategies | 10.3% |
EUS-GBD | |
Stent-in-stent strategy | 60% |
Clip closure of gastrointestinal wall defect | 13% |
Deployment of a new stent through the created fistula tract | 8% |
Non-endoscopic rescue strategies | 16% |
EUS-PFC | |
Deployment of a new stent through the created fistula tract | 64.5% |
Repeated EUS-guided drainage | 16.1% |
Stent-in-stent strategy | 12.9% |
Non-endoscopic rescue strategies | 3.2% |
- Citation: Armellini E, Metelli F, Anderloni A, Cominardi A, Aragona G, Marini M, Pace F. Lumen-apposing-metal stent misdeployment in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainages: A systematic review focusing on issues and rescue management. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(21): 3341-3361
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i21/3341.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i21.3341