Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2023; 29(20): 3168-3184
Published online May 28, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i20.3168
Published online May 28, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i20.3168
Figure 5 Comparison of model predictive performance in predicting overall survival.
A: Comparison of concordance index between conversion therapy (CT) model and traditional staging systems in the training cohort; B: Comparison of time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curve between CT model and other staging systems in the training cohort; the decision curve analysis curve compared the clinical practicability of the CT model and other six conventional hepatocellular carcinoma staging systems; C-E: 1-year (C), 2-year (D) and 3-year (E) survival benefit in the training cohort. AUC: Areas under receiver operating characteristic curve; CT: Conversion therapy; CNLC: China liver cancer staging; CLIP: Cancer of the Liver Italian Program; JIS: Japan integrated staging; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer.
- Citation: Wu JL, Luo JY, Jiang ZB, Huang SB, Chen GR, Ran HY, Liang QY, Huang MS, Lai LS, Chen JW. Inflammation-related nomogram for predicting survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma received conversion therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(20): 3168-3184
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i20/3168.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i20.3168