Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2023; 29(1): 157-170
Published online Jan 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i1.157
Published online Jan 7, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i1.157
Table 4 Pooled analysis of the adverse events
EUS-guided RFA for | Procedure-related adverse events according to ASGE[9]1 | |||
Mild, n (%) | Moderate, n (%) | Severe, n (%) | Mortality, n (%) | |
Neuroendocrine neoplasms EUS-RFA sessions = 114 | 11 (9.6) | 13 (11.4) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) |
Adenocarcinoma EUS-RFA sessions = 223 | 26 (11.6) | 3 (1.3) | 0 | 0 |
Cystic tumors EUS-RFA sessions = 44 | 3 (6.8) | 0 | 1 (2.3) | 0 |
Pooled data | 40 (10.5) | 16 (4.2) | 2 (0.5) | 1 (0.26) |
- Citation: Khoury T, Sbeit W, Napoléon B. Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic tumors: A critical review focusing on safety, efficacy and controversies. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(1): 157-170
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i1/157.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i1.157