Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2022; 28(48): 6900-6908
Published online Dec 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i48.6900
Published online Dec 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i48.6900
Type | Chromosomal instability | EBV | Microsatellite instability | Genomically stable |
Percentage | 50% | 9% | 21% | 20% |
Profile of patients | Male prevalence | Elderly age | Younger age | |
Location | GEJ, cardia | Corpus or fundus | Antrum | Distal location |
Lauren type | Intestinal | Intestinal | Poorly cohesive | |
Other pathological feature | DNA aneuploidy | Carcinoma with lymphoid stroma | ||
Prognosis | Favorable | Worst | ||
Genetic features | TP53 mutation | Extensive DNA promoter methylation | MLH1 promoter hypermethylation | Low copy number alterations and mutational burden |
Amplification of TKR | CDKN2A promoter hypermethylation | High mutational burden | ARID1, RHOA, CDH1 mutations | |
PIK3CA, ARID1A, BCOR mutations | CLDN18-ARHGAP26 fusion in 15% |
- Citation: Kinami S, Yamada S, Takamura H. Confusion and prospects for carcinogenesis of gastric adenoma and dysplasia: What is the correct answer currently? World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(48): 6900-6908
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i48/6900.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i48.6900