Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2022; 28(47): 6632-6661
Published online Dec 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632
Published online Dec 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632
System | Imaging modality | Polyp features | Accuracy | Complexity | TA/TVAs included | SSAs included |
Kudo | Any | Pits | AUC 0.94[143] | Complex | Yes | No |
NICE | NBI | Vessels and pits | Sensitivity 98%, NPV 97.8%[145] | Moderate | Yes | No |
JNET | NBI | Vessels and pits | AUC 0.97 for JNET 1, 0.84 for JNET 2A, 0.9 for JNET 3 but less accurate for JNET 2B (AUC 0.72)[152] | Moderate | Yes | No |
BASIC | BLI | Vessels, pits and surface | Accurate surveillance prediction in 90%, NPV for rectosigmoid polyps 91%[160] | Moderate | Yes | No |
WASP | Any | Pits, surface, shape | May improve SSA detection[162] | Simple | No | Yes |
mSano | NBI | Vessels, pits and surface | AUC 0.92[169] | Simple | Yes | Yes |
- Citation: Young EJ, Rajandran A, Philpott HL, Sathananthan D, Hoile SF, Singh R. Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(47): 6632-6661
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i47/6632.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632